Discourse Analysis of a Moodle Based Academic Discussion Among Student Community

Virendra Singh Nirban 1 *, Priyanka Kumari 1
More Detail
1 Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 5, Issue December 2015 - Special Issue, pp. 31-41. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5672
OPEN ACCESS   1392 Views   791 Downloads   Published online: 01 Dec 2015
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The last two decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in the number of users going online. While it has not happened overnight, the growth has been exponential in the last one decade. Chronologically, New media revolution started with the advent of internet. Innovations in computer and network technologies led to a massive adoption of communication technologies in varied forms. The scene in education domain is no different. There is lot of interest and investment in technology integrated education. With innovations such as MOODLE and MOOCS, the opportunities have grown manyfold. New media has enabled the end user to make a transition from a mere information consumer to a spontaneous information producer. Moreover, all along, new media has broken the space and time barrier leading to ubiquitous environment to communicate. It is in this context that the discourse generated through the new media is becoming an object of interest from research perspective. This paper uses a MOODLE based university Learning Management System and its discussion forums to make students participate in online discussions. The resulting academic discourse has been analysed using content analysis through a facet based approach. The objective of the study is to understand how technology and social aspects of an academic discussion are manifested in a mediated discourse.
Keywords: computer-mediated communication, new media, online discourse, content analysis, learning management system, discussion forum

CITATION

Nirban, V. S., & Kumari, P. (2015). Discourse Analysis of a Moodle Based Academic Discussion Among Student Community. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(December 2015 - Special Issue), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5672

REFERENCES

  • Brown, Stephen.“From VLEs to Learning Webs: The Implication of Web 2.0 for Learning and teaching.”Interactive Learning Environments18.1(2010): 1-10.Taylor&Francis.Web. 9 Jul.2008.
  • Churchill, Daniel.“Web2.0 in Education: A Study of the Explorative Use of Blogs with a Postgraduate Class.”Innovations inEducation andTeaching International 48.2 (2011): 149-158. Taylor &Francis. Web.18 May2011.
  • Crummett, Courtney D., Anna H.Perrault.“The Useof CMC Technologies in Academic Libraries.”Handbook ofResearch on Computer Mediated Communication.Sigrid Kelsey&Kirk St. Amant.Vol2, 2008.705-719.
  • Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Huang,Yueh-Min, Stephen J. H. Yang, andChin-Chung Tsai.“Web 2.0 for Interactive Learning.”Interactive LearningEnvironments17.4(2009): 257-259.Taylor& Francis.Web.10 Nov. 2009.
  • Kale, Ugur.“Can TheyPlan to Teach With Web 2.0?Future Teachers’ Potential Use of theEmerging Web.”Technology, Pedagogy and Education (2013): 1-19.Taylor & Francis.Web.14 Aug. 2013.
  • Level, Allison V.,Amy E. Hoseth.“Learning and Teaching with CMC in the U.S.Higher Education Arena.”Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication.SigridKelsey&Kirk St. Amant.Vol1, 2008. 34-48.
  • Newland, Barbara; Byles, Linda. “Changing AcademicTeaching with Web 2.0 Technologies.”Innovations in Education and Teaching International (2013).Taylor&Francis.Web.14 May 2013.
  • Olarinan, BolanleA.“Human Computer Interaction & the Best Mixes of Face-to-Face and E-Interactions in Educational Settings.” Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication.Sigrid Kelsey & Kirk St. Amant.Vol1, 2008. 49-61.
  • Olarinan, Bolanle A. “Culture, LearningStyles and Web 2.0.” Interactive Learning Environments 17.4(2009): 261-271.Taylor & Francis. Web.10 Nov. 2009.
  • Price, Apryl C. “Higher Education’s Use of Course Management Software.” Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication. Sigrid Kelsey & Kirk St. Amant.Vol 1, 2008.62-72.
  • Richardson, Will.“Teaching in a Web 2.0World.”Kappa Delta Pi Record 43.4(2007): 150-151.Taylor& Francis.Web 13Jul. 2012.
  • Risques, Angelica (2008).“E-Mentoring: An Extended Practice, an Emerging Discipline.”Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication. Sigrid Kelsey & Kirk St. Amant.Vol2, 2008. 656-677.
  • Su, Cheng-Chao, Karen Garcia.“Chat Roomsfor Language Teaching and Learning.”Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication.Sigrid Kelsey&Kirk St. Amant.Vol2, 2008.947- 968.
  • Herring, S. “A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse”. Language@Internet, 2007.