Techniques of Online Propaganda: A Case Study of Western Sahara Conflict

Sidi Sidi Mohamed Hamdani 1 *
More Detail
1 Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp. 237-243. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2653
OPEN ACCESS   3169 Views   2274 Downloads   Published online: 16 Jul 2018
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The role of the Internet in the proliferation of propaganda during conflicts has growingly assumed an increasing importance to those aiming at garnering public support for a political conflict. With a ceasefire brokered in 1991 by the United Nations, the conflict of Western Sahara shifted from the battles on the ground to a frenzy war in the mass media. The Internet has hitherto served as a significant new resource for politicians, media managers and propagandists from both conflicting sides to engender propaganda in its different forms.  Both Morocco and the Polisario have been active in this respect, utilizing propaganda strategies and techniques to manipulate the war of information on the Net.  In the literature about propaganda, it is common to refer to the seven propaganda techniques defined by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (IPA) founded in 1937: card stacking, name-calling, glittering generality, transfer, testimonial, plain folks, and bandwagon. Using the case of Western Sahara conflict, the goal of this study is to gain insight into those seven techniques in online propaganda messages. The focus is put on the propaganda campaign launched on the Internet by Morocco and the Polisario on many occasions during the conflict.
 
Keywords: Western Sahara, propaganda, internet

CITATION

Hamdani, S. S. M. (2018). Techniques of Online Propaganda: A Case Study of Western Sahara Conflict. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(3), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2653

REFERENCES

  • Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse as an indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies. 4, 139–145.
  • Alarcon, J. B., & Morales, K. N. S. (2011). Grammatical cohesion in students’ argumentative essay. Journal of English and Literature, 2(5), 114-127.
  • Allen, A. (2002). “Just Whose Side Is God On?” British Journalism Review 13 (4): 41–50.
  • Balabanova, E. (2007). Media, wars and politics comparing the incomparable in Western and Eastern Europe. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  • Daadaoui, M. (2008). The Western Sahara conflict: towards a constructivist approach to selfdetermination. The Journal of North African Studies, 13(2), 143-156.
  • Ellul, J. (1973). Propaganda: the formation of men's attitudes. New York: Vintage Books
  • International Crisis Group (2007) 'Western Sahara: the costs of the conflict', Middle East/North Africa Report, 66, 11 June, Brussels/Cairo.
  • Jackall, R. (1995). How to Detect Propaganda. Propaganda, 217-224
  • Jowett, G., & O'Donnell, V. (2015). Propaganda & persuasion. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Kleinsteuber, H. (2004)” Comparing Mass Communication Systems: Media Formats, Media Contents, and Media Porcesses”, in Esser, F., Pfetsch, B. (eds), Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 64-86
  • Lee, A. & Lee. (1939). The Fine Art of Propaganda: a study of Father Coughlin’s speeches, New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.
  • Tankard, J., & Severin, W. (1992). Communication Theories Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media. 3rd edn. New York: Longman.
  • Sproule, J. M. (1997). Propaganda and democracy: the American experience of media and mass persuasion. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waters, G. (1983). Media Analysis Techniques Arthur Asa Berger. Film Quarterly, 37(1), 53-53.