A decadal review of the role of communication-mobile technologies in promoting digital inclusion: Digital divide

Izida I. Ishmuradova 1 * , Alexey A. Chistyakov 2, Lev R. Klebanov 2, Valentin V. Sliusar 3, Mariia V. Sliusar 3, Genrikh S. Devyatkin 3, Nataliya N. Drobysheva 4
More Detail
1 Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
2 Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA
3 National Research University of Electronic Technology, Moscow, RUSSIA
4 Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 14, Issue 3, Article No: e202438. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14709
OPEN ACCESS   898 Views   445 Downloads   Published online: 11 Jun 2024
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Advancements in communication-mobile technologies have transformed the digital landscape, creating new opportunities while also exposing disparities in access and usage. This phenomenon of unequal digital participation, often termed the “digital divide”, can exacerbate inequalities. Bridging this divide through innovative technological solutions and policy interventions is critical for empowerment. This study investigates the role communication-mobile technologies have played in promoting digital inclusion over the past decade through a systematic review of academic literature. Fourteen studies published between 2012 and 2023 were analyzed following a rigorous selection process. A conceptual framework was developed to examine the layers of the digital divide, variety of divides, intervention types, and tools used. The analysis reveals the multifaceted nature of the divide across geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic dimensions. Communication and access emerge as pivotal elements, with studies emphasizing approaches like leveraging libraries as community hubs. The importance of multi-tiered interventions, from grassroots to policy-level, is pronounced. Arts, libraries, training, and mobile platforms are identified as key tools. While the findings largely align with the topics highlighted in the preliminary sections, gaps exist concerning insufficiently addressed divides and groups. Expanding the discourse to incorporate these areas can enrich the conceptualization of communication technologies’ role in digital inclusion. This timely systematic review provides a foundation for continued interrogation of digital participation challenges facing diverse global populations.
Keywords: digital divide, communication technologies, mobile technologies, rural areas, digital inclusion

CITATION

Ishmuradova, I. I., Chistyakov, A. A., Klebanov, L. R., Sliusar, V. V., Sliusar, M. V., Devyatkin, G. S., & Drobysheva, N. N. (2024). A decadal review of the role of communication-mobile technologies in promoting digital inclusion: Digital divide. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(3), e202438. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14709

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Shanab, E., & Al-Jamal, N. (2015). Exploring the gender digital divide in Jordan. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852414563201
  • Aruleba, K., & Jere, N. (2022). Exploring digital transforming challenges in rural areas of South Africa through a systematic review of empirical studies. Scientific African, 16, e01190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01190
  • Asmar, A., van Audenhove, L., & Mariën, I. (2020). Social support for digital inclusion: Towards a typology of social support patterns. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2627
  • Ayoung, D. A., Bugre, C., & Baada, F. N. A. (2020). An evaluation of the library connectivity project through the lens of the digital inclusion model. Information and Learning Science, 121(11-12), 805-827. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-02-2020-0047
  • Bearman, M., Smith, C. D., Carbone, A., Slade, S., Baik, C., Hughes-Warrington, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2012). Systematic review methodology in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(5), 625-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735
  • Brown, J. (2023). Identifying potential barriers to community participation and use of telecentres: A Philippines case study. Information Research, 28(2), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.47989/162
  • Buthelezi, M., Chatikobo, T., & Dalvit, L. (2021). United in diversity? Digital differences and inequalities within a South African rural community. Information Communication and Society, 24(3), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864000
  • Casselden, B. (2023). Not like riding a bike: How public libraries facilitate older people’s digital inclusion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(3), 704-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221101898
  • Castells, M. (2000). Toward a sociology of the network society. Contemporary Sociology, 29(5), 693-699. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234
  • Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., & Park, M.-C. (2016). A three-tier ICT access model for intention to participate online. Information Development, 32(3), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914529294
  • ChanLin, L. J., Chou, T. L., & Hung, W. H. (2015). Bridging volunteer services and mobile teaching in the tablet reading community. Libri, 65(4), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2015-0052
  • Cheng, H., Lyu, K., Li, J., & Shiu, H. (2022). Bridging the digital divide for rural older adults by family intergenerational learning: A classroom case in a rural primary school in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010371
  • Choudrie, J., Zamani, E., & Obuekwe, C. (2022). Bridging the digital divide in ethnic minority older adults: An organizational qualitative study. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1355-1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10126-8
  • Croicu, M., & Kreutz, J. (2017). Communication technology and reports on political violence: Cross-national evidence using African events data. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916670272
  • Dalgic-Tetikol, D. E., Guloglu, B., & Koksal, E. (2022). Determinants of internet adoption in Turkey and the need for a more coherent vision on information and communication technologies policy. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 23(4), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917221143060
  • Deng, X., Guo, M., & Liu, Y. (2023). Digital economy development and the urban-rural income gap: Evidence from Chinese cities. PLoS ONE, 18, e0280225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280225
  • Donner, J. (2008). Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: A review of the literature. Information Society, 24(3), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802019970
  • Drydakis, N. (2021). Mobile applications aiming to facilitate immigrants’ societal integration and overall level of integration, health and mental health. Does artificial intelligence enhance outcomes? Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106661
  • Duplaga, M. (2017). Digital divide among people with disabilities: Analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179825
  • Elena-Bucea, A., Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., & Coelho, P. S. (2021). Assessing the role of age, education, gender and income on the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4), 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9
  • Feurich, M., Kourilova, J., Pelucha, M., & Kasabov, E. (2023). Bridging the urban-rural digital divide: Taxonomy of the best practice and critical reflection of the EU countries’ approach. European Planning Studies, 23(3), 483-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2186167
  • Flynn, S. (2022). Bridging the age-based digital divide: An intergenerational exchange during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period in Ireland. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 20(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2022.2050334
  • Furuholt, B., & Kristiansen, S. (2007). A rural-urban digital divide? Regional aspects of Internet use in Tanzania. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 31(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2007.tb00215.x
  • Ginossar, T., & Nelson, S. (2010). Reducing the health and digital divides: A model for using community-based participatory research approach to e-health interventions in low-income Hispanic communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 530-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01513.x
  • Gu, J. (2021). Family conditions and the accessibility of online education: The digital divide and mediating factors. Sustainability, 13(15), 8590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158590
  • Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(27), 15536-15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
  • Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media and Society, 5(4), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480354003
  • Jauhiainen, J. S., Ozcurumez, S., & Tursun, O. (2022). Internet and social media uses, digital divides, and digitally mediated transnationalism in forced migration: Syrians in Turkey. Global Networks, 22(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12339
  • Jenkins, C. L., Imran, S., Mahmood, A., Bradbury, K., Murray, E., Stevenson, F., & Hamilton, F. (2022). Digital health intervention design and deployment for engaging demographic groups likely to be affected by the digital divide: Protocol for a systematic scoping review. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(3), e32538. https://doi.org/10.2196/32538
  • Jetha, A., Bonaccio, S., Shamaee, A., Banks, C. G., Bültmann, U., Smith, P. M., Tompa, E., Tucker, L. B., Norman, C., & Gignac, M. A. M. (2023). Divided in a digital economy: Understanding disability employment inequities stemming from the application of advanced workplace technologies. SSM-Qualitative Research in Health, 3, 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100293
  • Kosurko, A., Herron, R. V., Grigorovich, A., Bar, R. J., Kontos, P., Menec, V., & Skinner, M. W. (2022). Dance wherever you are: The evolution of multimodal delivery for social inclusion of rural older adults. Innovation in Aging, 6(2), igab058. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab058
  • Lameijer, C. S., Mueller, B., & Hage, E. (2017). Towards rethinking the digital divide–Recognizing shades of grey in older adult’s digital inclusion. In Proceedings of the ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation (pp. 1-12).
  • Lediga, M. M., & Fombad, M. C. (2018). The use of information and communication technologies in public libraries in South Africa as tools for bridging the digital divide: The case of the Kempton Park Public Library. Public Library Quarterly, 37(3), 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1471964
  • Liu, J. (2021). Bridging digital divide amidst educational change for socially inclusive learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211060810
  • Mason, A. M., Compton, J., & Bhati, S. (2021). Disabilities and the digital divide: Assessing web accessibility, readability, and mobility of popular health websites. Journal of Health Communication, 26(10), 667-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1987591
  • Mendoza-Lozano, F. A., Quintero-Peña, J. W., & García-Rodríguez, J. F. (2021). The digital divide between high school students in Colombia. Telecommunications Policy, 45(10), 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102226
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Neves, B. B., & Mead, G. (2021). Digital technology and older people: Towards a sociological approach to technology adoption in later life. Sociology, 55(5), 888-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520975587
  • Neves, B. B., Waycott, J., & Malta, S. (2018). Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualizing and contesting the ‘age-based digital divide.’ Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318766119
  • Norman, H., Adnan, N. H., Nordin, N., Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (2022). The educational digital divide for vulnerable students in the pandemic: Towards the new agenda 2030. Sustainability, 14(16), 10332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610332
  • OECD. (2001). Understanding the digital divide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766
  • Ogbo, E., Brown, T., Gant, J., & Sicker, D. (2021). When being connected is not enough: An analysis of the second and third levels of the digital divide in a developing country. Journal of Information Policy, 11, 104-146. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.11.2021.0104
  • Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2013). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769
  • Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., Blunt, H., Brigham, T., Chang, S., Clark, J., Conway, A., Couban, R., de Kock, S., Farrah, K., Fehrmann, P., Foster, M., Fowler, S. A., Glanville, J., …, & Young, S. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
  • Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9
  • Spanakis, P., Peckham, E., Mathers, A., Shiers, D., & Gilbody, S. (2021). The digital divide: Amplifying health inequalities for people with severe mental illness in the time of COVID-19. British Journal of Psychiatry, 219(4), 529-531. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.56
  • Suwana, F., & Lily. (2017). Empowering Indonesian women through building digital media literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 212-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.004
  • Tan, K. S. Y., & Chan, C. M. L. (2018). Unequal access: Applying Bourdieu’s practice theory to illuminate the challenges of ICT use among senior citizens in Singapore. Journal of Aging Studies, 47, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.04.002
  • Valdez, R. S., Rogers, C. C., Claypool, H., Trieshmann, L., Frye, O., Wellbeloved-Stone, C., & Kushalnagar, P. (2021). Ensuring full participation of people with disabilities in an era of telehealth. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(2), 389-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa297
  • van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
  • Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2023). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955-969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3
  • Vong, W. T., Kong, M. L. F., Lai, C. C. E., Then, P. H. H., & Teo, T. H. (2017). Investigating the roles of knowledge management practices in empowering rural youth to bridge the digital divide in rural Sarawak. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 21(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2017-0012
  • Wilkin, S., Davies, H., & Eynon, R. (2017). Addressing digital inequalities amongst young people: Conflicting discourses and complex outcomes. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305058
  • Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Dasgupta, R. K., & Xia, R. (2023). Narrowing the age-based digital divide: Developing digital capability through social activities. Information Systems Journal, 33(2), 268-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12400