An investigation into the rationales for the use and non-use of technological tools by Thai EFL university teachers during and after the COVID-19 pandemic

Atipat Boonmoh 1, Kannikar Boonkhaos 2 *
More Detail
1 King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, THAILAND
2 Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani, THAILAND
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 15, Issue 2, Article No: e202516. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16180
OPEN ACCESS   536 Views   62 Downloads   Published online: 18 Mar 2025
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study explores how Thai university instructors adjusted their use of technology before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. It aims to examine the technological tools that instructors used during the pandemic, identify which tools remained in use as teaching returned to in-person and hybrid formats, and investigate the factors influencing their adoption, discontinuation, or continued use. Semi-structured interviews with eight instructors from various universities provided detailed insights into their decisions about adopting and discontinuing certain technologies. The findings indicated significant shifts in technology usage: tools like randomizer apps, essential during remote learning, were abandoned when face-to-face classes resumed. Conversely, tools like Zoom and PowerPoint remained widely used in both in-person and hybrid settings due to their versatility. The use of platforms such as Google Meet and Microsoft Teams decreased as virtual interactions declined. Tools that enhance teaching effectiveness, like Quillbot and ChatGPT, were adopted for their benefits in content delivery and student interaction. Design tools such as Canva saw increased usage for creating engaging visual content. Analysis using the technology acceptance model revealed that the perceived usefulness of tools, instructors’ attitudes towards technology, and institutional support significantly influenced these trends. The shift towards hybrid teaching models also supported the continued use of adaptable and effective tools. These results highlight the importance of understanding instructors’ preferences and challenges with technology to help educational institutions develop targeted support and professional development programs. Properly aligning technology integration with teaching needs can enhance educational quality and student engagement in a post-pandemic landscape.
Keywords: rationale, use of technological tool, Thai EFL university teacher, COVID-19 pandemic, technology acceptance model

CITATION

Boonmoh, A., & Boonkhaos, K. (2025). An investigation into the rationales for the use and non-use of technological tools by Thai EFL university teachers during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(2), e202516. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16180

REFERENCES

  • Al Arif, T. Z. Z., Armiwati, A., & Handayani, R. (2023). The use of ICT for English language learning: A mixed-method study of EFL university students. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v8i2.1554
  • Alibrahim, A. A. (2024). E-learning after the pandemic from the perspective of digital skills teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n2p149
  • Boonmoh, A., Jumpakate, T., & Karpklon, S. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions and experience in using technology for the classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 22(1), 1–24. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/download/320/251/815
  • Boonmoh, A., & Kulavichian, I. (2023). Exploring Thai EFL pre-service teachers’ technology integration based on the SAMR model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep457. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13567
  • Brown, M., & Green, T. (2023). The impact of advanced educational technologies on teaching practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 123–140.
  • Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, Article 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100204
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
  • Jin, L., & Deifell, E. (2013). Foreign language learners’ use and perception of online dictionaries: A survey study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 515–533.
  • Kabilan, M. K., Adlina, W. F. W., & Embi, M. A. (2011). Online collaboration of English language teachers for meaningful professional development experiences. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 94–115.
  • Kanchai, T. (2021). EFL teachers’ ICT literacy acquisition to online instruction during COVID-19. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 282–312. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/253270
  • Kornpitack, P., & Sawmong, S. (2022). Empirical analysis of factors influencing student satisfaction with online learning systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. Heliyon, 8(3), Article e09183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09183
  • Kusuma, I. P. I. (2022). Why this and not that social media? Reasons for using technology during online practice teaching. The JALT CALL Journal, 18(2), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v18n2.593
  • Li, D. (2022). The shift to online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits, challenges, and required improvements from the students’ perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2106
  • Neerapan, W. (2025). Enhancing curriculum development education through digital technology integration: A mixed-methods study of undergraduate teacher preparation in Thailand. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1-2), 99–114. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmhs1_s/article/view/276427
  • Nurzhanova, S., Stambekova, A., Zhaxylikova, K., Tatarinova, G., Aitenova, E., & Zhumabayeva, Z. (2024). Investigation of future teachers’ digital literacy and technology use skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 12(2), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3826
  • Praditsorn, P., & Ulla, M. B. (2022). Supporting online language teaching: The use of Zoom and Facebook (Zoom-booking). The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 26(2).
  • Pribeanu, C., Gorghiu, G., & Santi, E. A. (2022). Drivers of continuance intention to use the online learning platform after the COVID-19 pandemic. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(5), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.724
  • Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  • Sugandini, D., Istanto, Y., Garaika, Arundati, R., & Purnama, R. F. (2021). Technology adoption model on higher education learning environments. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 4(3), 680–692.
  • Suphakicco, P. S. (2022). The trends of education after the COVID-19 situation in Thailand. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.499
  • Ulla, M. B., & Espique, F. P. (2022). Hybrid teaching and the hybridization of education: Thai university teachers’ perspectives, practices, challenges. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.758
  • Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2022). Hybrid teaching: Conceptualization through practice for the post COVID19 pandemic education. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 924594. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924594
  • Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., & Carretero, S. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Xia, X., Chen, B., Feng, M., & Jing, Y. (2023). A study on educational technology acceptance of special education teachers in language teaching based on TAM model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(10), 1591–1596. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.10.1966
  • Zhou, X., Li, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). Online education during COVID-19: Perspectives from Chinese university students and teachers. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 16(1), 89–104.