Analyzing e-government agencies’ Twitter/X engagement: A case study of Nevada

Jungeun Victoria Song 1 * , Kendall Hartley 1, Christopher Stream 1, Jessica Word 1
More Detail
1 University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 14, Issue 4, Article No: e202450. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15015
OPEN ACCESS   928 Views   367 Downloads   Published online: 31 Aug 2024
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research aims to investigate the dynamics of interactivity between Nevada’s e-government and its citizens through the utilization of social media, with a specific focus on Twitter. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study analyzed how Nevada state agencies engage with the public on Twitter, while concurrently assessing citizens’ responses through qualitative empirical research. These responses were categorized into content features, encompassing subjective opinions and sentiments (positive/negative), and structural features, comprising objective elements like special characteristics and multimedia components. Content analysis was employed to explore these features, leading to the identification of seven themes within a hypothesized two-dimensional framework, encompassing both the reflection of interactivity and the transmission of interactivity.
Quantitative methods, specifically ANOVA and multiple regression analysis, were utilized to test the hypothesis. The findings revealed that Nevada e-government agencies predominantly used Twitter for one-way information dissemination, with limited two-way communication with citizens. To enhance interactivity, it is suggested that e-government posts incorporate multimedia elements and external links to facilitate information dissemination. Public administrators in the State of Nevada should focus on providing valuable and beneficial government posts, encouraging citizens to respond and express their opinions. Continuous training for public administrators is recommended, given the rapid advancements in technology and social media platforms.
Furthermore, adopting best practices from domestic and international social media companies is advised to stay innovative. Public administration should transition from merely governing individuals and information to becoming facilitators and moderators of discourse on social media platforms. State e-government can strengthen citizen interaction by consistently delivering valuable information on social media, thereby obtaining immediate feedback, and influencing public opinion.
Keywords: e-government in Nevada state, social media platforms, Twitter/X, interactivity, public administration, citizens

CITATION

Song, J. V., Hartley, K., Stream, C., & Word, J. (2024). Analyzing e-government agencies’ Twitter/X engagement: A case study of Nevada. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), e202450. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15015

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2021). Demographic factors as determinants of e-government adoption. In O. Yildiz (Ed.), Recent Developments in Individual and Organizational Adoption of ICTs (pp. 60–81). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3045-0.ch004
  • Bonsón, E., Perea, D., & Bednárová, M. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
  • Born, C., Meschede, C., Siebenlist, T., & Mainka, A. (2019). Pushing open government through social media. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3366–3375). HICSS. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.406
  • Brainard, L. A., & McNutt, J. G. (2010). Virtual government–citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative? Administration & Society, 42(7), 836–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710386308
  • Bretschneider, S. I., & Mergel, I. (2011). Technology and public management information systems. In D. C. Menzel, H. E. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 187–203). Routledge.
  • Choenni, S., Bargh, M. S., Busker, T., & Netten, N. (2022). Data governance in smart cities: Challenges and solution directions. Journal of Smart Cities and Society, 1(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.3233/SCS-210119
  • Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
  • Davies, J. (2018, February 20). Why the city of Las Vegas turns to social media to increase citizen engagement. Sprout Blog. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/case-studies/las-vegas-citizen-engagement/
  • DePaula, N., Dincelli, E., & Harrison, T. M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003
  • Dommett, K., & Verovšek, P. J. (2021). Promoting democracy in the digital public sphere: Applying theoretical ideals to online political communication. Javnost - The Public, 28(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1955206
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Fretwell, E. N. (2016, April 29). The influence of social media in the public sector. PA Times. https://patimes.org/influence-social-media-public-sector/
  • Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from chief information officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.006
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Beacon.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (T. Burger, Trans.). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. (Original work published 1962)
  • Habermas, J. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 428). MIT Press.
  • Hao, X., Zheng, D., Zeng, Q., & Fan, W. (2016). How to strengthen the social media interactivity of e-government: Evidence from China. Online Information Review, 40(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2015-0084
  • Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652
  • Hosseini, P., Hosseini, P., & Broniatowski, D. A. (2020). Content analysis of Persian/Farsi tweets during COVID-19 pandemic in Iran using NLP. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.08400
  • Hrdinová, J., Helbig, N., & Peters, C. S. (2010). Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany.
  • Kellner, D. (2014). Habermas, the public sphere, and democracy. In D. Boros, & J. M. Glass (Eds.), Re-imagining public space (pp. 19–43): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373311_2
  • Kersey, T. (2011). Public communication in the networked public sphere [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University].
  • Khan, S., Zairah, A., Rahim, N., & Maarop, N. (2020). A systematic literature review and a proposed model on antecedents of trust to use social media for e-government services. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.02.007
  • Knox, C. C. (2016). Public administrators’ use of social media platforms: Overcoming the legitimacy dilemma? Administration & Society, 48(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713503463
  • Logas, J., Schlesinger, A., Li, Z., & Das, S. (2022). Image DePO: Towards gradual decentralization of online social networks using decentralized privacy overlays. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512907
  • Lovari, A., & Valentini, C. (2020). Public sector communication and social media: Opportunities and limits of current policies, activities, and practices. In V. Luoma-aho, & M.-J. Canel (Eds.), The handbook of public sector communication (pp. 315–328). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203.ch21
  • Lutkoski, B. P. (2011). A content analysis of North Carolina State Agency Twitter feeds [Masters paper, University of North Carolina]. https://doi.org/10.17615/hzff-s084
  • Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2023). Emerging trends in social media for e-governance and citizen engagement: A case study of telegram in Cambodia. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, Article 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100347
  • Manoharan, A. (2013). A three dimensional assessment of U.S. county e-government. State and Local Government Review, 45(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x13494858
  • Mergel, I. (2010). Government 2.0 revisited: Social media strategies in the public sector. PA Times, American Society for Public Administration, 33(3), 7 & 10.
  • Mergel, I. (2011). The use of social media to dissolve knowledge silos in government. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration, public management, and public service around the world (pp. 177–184). Georgetown University Press.
  • Mergel, I. (2012). The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity, 17(3, 4), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-000281
  • Mergel, I. (2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015
  • Misran, M., Kurnaedi, D., Nurmandi, A., Rahmawati, D. E., & Budiman, B. (2021). Local government use website and Twitters as communication and interaction tools. The Journal of Society and Media, 5(2), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v5n2.p438-455
  • Moreno, L., Martínez, P., Muguerza, J., & Abascal, J. (2018). Support resource based on standards for accessible e-government transactional services. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 58, 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.01.003
  • Munks, J. (2016, December 11). City of Las Vegas tapping into the potential of social media. Las Vegas Review-Journal. https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/city-of-las-vegas-tapping-into-the-potential-of-social-media/
  • Nedeljakova, K. (2023). Reimagining political advocacy in the age of social media: Insights from the Grassy Mountain Mine project [Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland].
  • Neves, A. (2023). Twitter multimedia feature: What it is and how to use it. Rock Content. https://rockcontent.com/blog/twitter-multimedia-feature/
  • Obama, B. (2009). Transparency and open government: Memorandum for the heads of executive department and agencies. Whitehouse. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment
  • Park, M. J., Choi, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2015). Trust in government’s social media service and citizen’s patronage behavior. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.006
  • Ruano, S. A. (2019). The hashtag as a tool to set up a governmental agenda. Central and Eastern European e|Dem and e|Gov Days, 335, 369–375. https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v335.30
  • Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798
  • Song, J. E. (2017). The use of social media interactivity between Nevada e-government agencies and the public: An analysis of the role and impact of Twitter accounts [PhD Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas]. https://doi.org/10.34917/11156821
  • Stone, J. A., & Can, S. H. (2021). Investigating factors of Twitter use among municipal governments. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2019.1628673
  • Turner, J. H. (2013). Theoretical sociology: A concise introduction to twelve sociological theories. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374635
  • Yoon, J. W., Hagen, L., Andrews, J., Scharf, R., Keller, T., & Chung, E. (2019). On the use of multimedia in Twitter health communication: Analysis of posts regarding the Zika virus. Information Research, 24(2).
  • Zhang, M., Li, H., & Wei, J. (2008). Examining the relationship between organizational culture and performance: The perspectives of consistency and balance. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-008-0015-6