Composing Excitement: Understanding the Visual Rhetoric of the Voice

Jason Tham 1 *
More Detail
1 University of Minnesota, USA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 33-49. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2589
OPEN ACCESS   1693 Views   1158 Downloads   Published online: 26 Apr 2017
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Reality TV has been increasingly studied by media and cultural studies scholars and practitioners, becoming a subject of critique across the disciplines of communication. While many reality TV programs have been the target of analysis for racism, sexism, and violence cultivation, not much has been done to explore the visual compositions in this genre to consider the rhetoric of excitement or audience stimulation. Using a data-driven approach, this article examines the visual formats and presentational structures employed by a popular reality franchise vocal competition show, The Voice, as produced in China, America, and the United Kingdom. Through a comparative content analysis, the author examines the 2014 finale performances of each version of the show, focusing on their stage design, cinematography, and screen graphics. This study finds distinctions in the show’s visual mechanism across three countries, thus suggesting imperative insights to the diversity of visual characterization and the functions of visual rhetoric in a modern TV talent show.

CITATION

Tham, J. (2017). Composing Excitement: Understanding the Visual Rhetoric of the Voice. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(2), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2589

REFERENCES

  • Brummett, B. (2011). A Rhetoric of Style. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Brummett, B. (2011). Rhetoric in Popular Culture (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C: Sage.
  • Burke, K. (1950). A Rhetoric of Motives. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Caivano, J. L., & Lopez, M. (2003).The rhetoric of black, white, and red: Reasonability and aesthetics to persuade with color. In A. Hansuebsai (Ed.), Proceedings from AIC 2013 Bangkok: Color Communication and Management. Bangkok, Thailand: The Color Group of Thailand.
  • Carteret, M. (2011). Non-verbal behavior in cross-cultural interactions.Dimensions of Culture: Cross-Cultural Communications for Healthcare Professionals. Retrieved from http://www.dimensionsofculture.com/2010/11/non-verbal-behavior-in-crossculturalinteractions/
  • Godlewski L., & Perse, E. (2010).Audience activity and reality television: Identification, online activity, and satisfaction.Communication Quarterly, 58(2), 148-169.
  • Hall, E. (1964). Silent assumptions in social communication.Disorders of Communication, 42, 41-55.
  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mirzoeff, N. (2002). What is visual culture? In Nicholas Mirzoeff (Ed.), The Visual Culture Reader (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • NBC. (2014). About the show. Retrieved from http://www.nbc.com/the-voice/about
  • Slocum, C. (2014). The real history of reality TV, or, how Alan Funt won the Cold War.Writers Guild of America. Retrieved from http://www.wga.org/organizesub.aspx?id=1099
  • Szalai, G. (2013). Simon Cowell’s ‘Britain’s Got Talent,’ ‘The Voice UK’ ratings rise.The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/simoncowells-britains-got-talent-463466
  • Thompson, R., & Bowen, C. J. (2009). Grammar of the Edit (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Focal Press.