Government Public Relations in Turkey: Social Media Usage of Turkish Ministries in Relationship Building

Hatun Boztepe-Taskiran 1 *
More Detail
1 Istanbul University, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 48-63. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2537
OPEN ACCESS   2445 Views   1945 Downloads   Published online: 15 Jan 2016
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, developing long-term and positive relationships by government agencies with publics and managing the relationships strategically became very important. Social media provides a number of opportunities for government agencies in terms of building relationships and engaging with publics, developing relationships based on dialogue, ensuring the public participation in decision making and implementation. Taking advantage of the opportunities provided by the social media in terms of relationship building between government agencies and publics depends on full utilization of the interaction and participation supporting characteristics and the dialogic capacity that it provides. This study focused on revealing the case of benefiting from the opportunities offered by social media in order for ministries in Turkey to establish a relationship with publics and analyzed whether the social media is used for the purpose of one-way message transmission to publics or used accordingly with the nature of two-way symmetrical communication. Within the scope of study, corporate Facebook profiles and Twitter accounts of Turkish ministries were analyzed with a content analysis method. Findings were achieved through the analyzing social media accounts of Turkish ministries indicated that social media is used for one – way communication by the ministries. Moreover, it was seen that Turkish ministries do not take advantage of dialogical capacity of social media as a relationship building tool.
Keywords: Government Public Relations, Government Agencies, Relationship Building, Social Media

CITATION

Boztepe-Taskiran, H. (2016). Government Public Relations in Turkey: Social Media Usage of Turkish Ministries in Relationship Building. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2537

REFERENCES

  • Agostino, D. (2013). Using Social Media to Engage Citizens: A Study of Italian Municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39, 232 – 234.
  • Avidar, R. (2013). The Responsiveness Pyramid: Embedding Responsiveness and Interactivity into Public Relations Theory. Public Relations Review, 39, 440 – 450.
  • Baskin, O., Aronoff, C. & Lattimore, D. (1997). Public Relations The Profession and The Practice. 4th edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.
  • Black, S. (1989). Introduction To Public Relations. 2nd edition. London: The Modino Press.
  • Bortree, D. S. & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic Strategies and Outcomes: An Analysis of Environmental Advocacy Groups’ Facebook Profiles. Public Relations Review, 35, 317 – 319.
  • Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F. &Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping Up With the Digital Age: How the American Red Cross Use Social Media To Build Relationships. Public Relations Review, 37, 37 – 43.
  • Bruning, S. D., Dials, M. &Shirka, A. (2008). Using Dialogue To Build Organization – Public Relationships Engage Publics and Positively Affect Organizational Outcomes. Public Relations Review, 24, 25 – 31.
  • Bruning, S. D. &Ledingham, J. A. (2000a). Perceptions of Relationships and Evaluations of Satisfaction: An Exploration of Interaction. Public Relations Review, 26 (1), 85 – 95.
  • Bruning, S. D. &Ledingham, J. A. (2000b). Organization and Key Public Relationships: Testing the Influence of the Relationship Dimensions in a Business – To – Business Context. In J. A. Ledingham& S. D. Bruning (Eds.). Public Relations As Relationship Management A Relational Approach To the Study and Practice of Public Relations (pp. 159 – 173). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H. & Broom, G. M. (2006).Effective Public Relations.9th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
  • E – government (2015). Retrieved from http://www.turkiye.gov.tr/kurumlar
  • Etter, M. (2013). Reasons For Low Levels of Interactivity (Non-) Interactive CSR Communication in Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39, 606 – 608.
  • Frahm K. A. & Martin, L. L. (2009). From Government To Governance: Implications For Social Work Administration. Administration in Social Work, 33, 407 – 422.
  • Grunig, J. E. (2006). After 50 years: The Value and Values of Public Relations. The Institute for Public Relations 45th Annual Distinguished Lecture, New York, 1 – 7.
  • Grunig, J. E. &Huan, Y. H. (2000). From Organizational Effectiveness To Relationship Indicators: Antecendents of Relationships, Public Relations Strategies, and Relationship Outcomes”. In J. A. Ledingham& S. D. Bruning (Eds.). Public Relations As Relationship Management A Relational Approach To the Study and Practice of Public Relations (pp. 23 – 53). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Jo, S. (2006). Measurement of Organization – Public Relationships: Validation of Measurement Using A Manufacturer – Retailer Relationship. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18 (3), 225 – 248.
  • Jo, S., Hon, L. C. & Brunner, B. R. (2004). Organization – Public Relationships: Measurement Validation in A University Setting. Journal of Communication Management, 9 (1), 14 – 27.
  • Jo, s. & Kim, Y. (2003).The Effect of Web Characteristics on Relationship Building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15 (3), 199 – 223.
  • Jordan, A. &Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing As Governance. London: Sage Publications.
  • Lee, G. &Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model For Social Media – Based Public Engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 492 – 503.
  • Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D. & Saxton G. D. (2012). Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less. Public Relations Review, 48, 313 – 318.
  • McNutt, K. (2014). Public Engagement in the Web 2.0 Era: Social Collaborative Technologies in A Public Sector Context. Canadian Public Administration, 57 (1), 49 – 70.
  • Park, H. &Reber, B. H. (2008). Relationship Building and the Use of Web Sites: How Fortune 500 Corporations Use Their Web Sites To Build Relationships. Public Relations Review, 34, 409 – 411.
  • Rybalko, S. & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic Communication in 140 Character or Less: How Fortune 500 Companies Engage Stakeholders Using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36, 336 – 341.
  • Smith, B. G. (2012). Public Relations Identity and The Stakeholder – Organization Relationship: A Revised Theoretical Position For Public Relations Scholarship. Public Relations Review, 38, 838 – 845.
  • Treib, O., Holger, B. & Gerda, F. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards A Conceptual Clarification. Journal of European Public Policy. 14 (1), 1 – 20.
  • Watson, T. & Noble, P. (2005).Evaluating Public Relations. London: Kogan Page.
  • We Are Social Report (2014). Retrieved from http://wearesocial.net/tag/turkey/
  • Wise, K. & APR (2007). The Organization and Implementation of Relationship Management.Health Marketing Quarterly. 24 (3 – 4), 151 – 166.