“I Say That World May Go To Pot For Me So Long As I Always Get My Tea”: About the Self-Schemas Activation in Social Influence Techniques

Karolina Dobrosz-Michiewicz 1 *
More Detail
1 University of Lodz, Poland
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 4, Issue October 2014 - Special Issue, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5700
OPEN ACCESS   1365 Views   759 Downloads   Published online: 01 Oct 2014
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Concern for the positive self-image is one of the most important human adaptive traits and affects many of our social behaviors, e.g. related with self-promotion or self-defense (Oleś, 2003, 243). Self-system discrepancy causes negative emotions. To avoid them e.g. in motivational approach/avoidance conflicts, people prefer to choose information congruent with their self-schemas, irrespective of messages rightness or truth (Kofta, Dolinski 2000). Furthermore, the regulatory fit state (between individuals motivational orientation to a goal and the manner in which they pursue the goal)  as provided  increases the effectiveness of persuasive appeals (Higgins, 2000, 2005, 2007). Study present the results of natural experiment made in July 2013 to verify (1) if it is possible to influence people referring to their self-schemas activation and (2) how to use the self-schemas activation to increase persuasion. In 2 x 2 between subject factorial design, the subjects were influenced in one of four experimental conditions (self-schema activation vs. no activation message-goal congruence: congruent vs incongruent; Higgins 2012a). The results indicate two conclusions: (1) self-schema activation and goal-message congruency increase the level of social influence but the effect of congruency was stronger than self-schema; (2) self-schema activation increases the effect of goal-message congruency.
Keywords: social influence techniques, motivational approach/avoidance conflicts, self-schemas activation, regulatory fit

CITATION

Dobrosz-Michiewicz, K. (2014). “I Say That World May Go To Pot For Me So Long As I Always Get My Tea”: About the Self-Schemas Activation in Social Influence Techniques. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 4(October 2014 - Special Issue), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5700

REFERENCES

  • Bąk W. (2008). Teoria ukierunkowań regulacyjnych E. Tory Higginsa, Roczniki Psychologiczne, 9, 1.
  • Cesario J. F.,GrantH,m Higgins E.T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuation: transfer from feeling right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86.
  • Cesario J. F., Higgins E.T., Scholer A.A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuation: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychological Compass, 2/1.
  • Doliński D. (2011). Techniki wpływu społecznego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Doliński D., Drogosz M. (2007). Czy obywatele poszliby głosować przeciw? Regulacyjne nastawienie na promocję vs prewencję a aktywność wyborcza. Kolokwia psychologiczne, 16.
  • Freitas A.L, Higgins E.T (2002). Enjoying goal-direction action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13.
  • Higgins E.T (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit.American Psychologist, 55.
  • Higgins E.T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement.Psychological Review, 113.
  • Higgins E.T. (2012a). Regulatory fit focus, Handbook of theories of social psychology.
  • Higgins E.T. (2012b). Accesability theory, Handbook of theories of social psychology.
  • Kofta M., Doliński D. (2000). Poznawcze podejście do osobowości, w: J. Strelau (red.) Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki (t.2). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Lee A.Y., Aaker J. L. (2004). Bringing the Frome into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86.
  • Lockwood P., Jordan C.H., Kunda Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83.
  • Oleś P. K. (2003). Wprowadzenie do psychologii osobowości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Pervin L.A. (2002). Psychologia osobowości. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Semin G.R, Higgins T., de Montes L.G., Estourget Y, Valencia J.F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89.
  • Spiegel S., Grant-Pillow H., Higgins E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strenght during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34.
  • Wojciszke B. (2011). Psychologia społeczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.