Mapping e-learning policy in higher education: Global perspectives and emerging trends

Kai Hu 1 2, Arumugam Raman 2 * , Fei Ya Shan 3
More Detail
1 School of Foreign Languages, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, CHINA
2 College of Arts and Science, School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, MALAYSIA
3 College of Arts and Science, School of Applied Psychology, Social Work & Policy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, MALAYSIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 15, Issue 1, Article No: e202507. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15947
OPEN ACCESS   380 Views   87 Downloads   Published online: 11 Feb 2025
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This paper explores worldwide researchers’ perspectives on e-learning policy in higher education, focusing on an approach that examines English-language and Chinese-language literature, which elucidates the intricate nature of e-learning policy. Despite a number of studies on e-learning policy in higher education context, few have considered using two linguistic databases (English and Chinese) for evaluating global perspectives on e-learning policy. To make sure that the review was composed systematically, the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis was utilized, four English (Scopus, ERIC, Google Scholar, & SAGE) and three Chinese databases—China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese University of Hong Kong Library, and Airiti Library—were used to screen pertinent studies for analyzing. Authors reached a consensus on coding 60 studies into six categories, which encompass perceptual, portraying, theory, literature reviews, comparative study, and discourse analysis. The review reveals a clear focus on theoretical articles in both English- and Chinese-language literature, with these articles being the most common across six segments. To further explore emerging trends on e-learning policy research, three primary themes and 19 sub-themes are identified from 60 studies. Implications for advancing future research are outlined.
Keywords: e-learning policy, global perspectives, higher education, systematic literature review

CITATION

Hu, K., Raman, A., & Shan, F. Y. (2025). Mapping e-learning policy in higher education: Global perspectives and emerging trends. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(1), e202507. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15947

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.
  • Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. Wiley.
  • Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
  • Boezerooij, P., van der Wende, M., & Huisman, J. (2007). The need for e-learning strategies: Higher education institutions and their responses to a changing environment. Tertiary Education and Management, 13, 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701535471
  • Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R., Mills, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R., Bethel, E., Lowerison, G., Pickup, D., & Surkes, M. (2011). An extended systematic review of Canadian policy documents on e-learning: What we’re doing and not doing. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de la Technologie, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T22P41
  • Brown, M., Anderson, B., & Murray, F. (2007). E-learning policy issues: Global trends, themes and tensions. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. In Proceedings of ASCILITE 2007.
  • Bryant, P. (2016). From the middle out–Making pedagogical change happen in a complex, messy world. Peter Bryant. http://peterbryant.smegradio.com/?p=600
  • Chikuni, P. R. (2017). The relationship between policy-making processes and e-learning policy discourses in higher education institutions in South Africa [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town].
  • Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities. Computers & Education, 53(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.006
  • Czerniewicz, L., & Rother, K. (2018). Institutional educational technology policy and strategy documents: An inequality gaze. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918761708
  • Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox, and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18
  • de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500046255
  • Du, H., Jia, T., & Gu, X. (2020). Comparative analysis of educational informatization development planning policies at home and abroad. Modern Educational Technology, (12), 5–11.
  • Ellahi, A., & Zaka, B. (2015). Analysis of higher education policy frameworks for open and distance education in Pakistan. Evaluation Review, 39(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X15570046
  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558
  • Goeman, K. (2006). Europe and flanders: Partners in e-learning? A comparison of public policies. European Journal of Education, 41(3–4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00281.x
  • Guo, Y. (2023). Policy evolution, practical dilemmas, and insights of digital development in European higher education. China Higher Education Research, (11), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2023.11.08
  • Han, L., & Li, K. (2019). Research on keywords of educational informatization policy: Based on the analysis of 51 educational policy documents. Educational Modernization, (A2), 237–239. https://doi.org/10.16541/j.cnki.2095-8420.2019.102.116
  • Harley, D., & Lawrence, S. (2007). The regulation of e-learning: New national and international policy perspectives. Center for Studies in Higher Education. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74q6c70t
  • Holt, D., & Challis, D. (2007). From policy to practice: One university’s experience of implementing strategic change through wholly online teaching and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1276
  • Hosie, P., Schibeci, R., & Backhaus, A. (2005). A framework and checklists for evaluating online learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500187097
  • Hu, K., & Raman, A. (2024). Systematic literature review on the holistic integration of e-learning in universities: Policy, human, financial, and technical perspectives. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), Article ep497. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14287
  • Hu, Q., & Zhang, X. (2018). Connotation, thinking mode, and systemic reform of Education Informatization 2.0. Modern Distance Education Research, (06), 12–20.
  • Hu, Y. (2021). Quantitative analysis of higher education informatization policy texts in China: Based on the perspective of policy tools. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Educational Science, (04), 43–49.
  • Jiang, Y., Shang, J., & Jiao, L. (2023). Review of China’s online education policy, 1999-2022. ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221099581
  • Kenney, J., Hermens, A., & Clarke, T. (2004). The political economy of e-learning educational development: Strategies, standardisation and scalability. Education + Training, 46(6/7), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410555286
  • Lawn, M., & Normand, R. (2015). Introduction. In M. Lawn, & R. Normand (Eds.), Shaping of European education: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 1–13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796581
  • Liang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Research on the informatization policy of higher education in China based on discourse analysis. Journal of Liaoning Normal University, (02), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.16216/j.cnki.lsxbwk.202002067
  • Liang, Y., Fan, D., & Nie, G. (2019). Review of the theory of policy change in higher education informatization. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, (12), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.19903/j.cnki.cn23-1074/g.2019.12.010
  • Liang, Y., Zhang, L., & Nie, G. (2024). Has the implementation of e-learning policy in higher education promoted the “improvement of quality and efficiency” in higher education? An empirical study based on the difference-in-differences method. Modern Education Management, (02), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.16697/j.1674-5485.2024.02.011
  • Liu, J., Liu, M., Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). A cascading roadmap for educational informatization policy formulation: A review of the “guidelines for educational informatization policy and macro planning.” World Education Information, (01), 10–18.
  • Liu, M., & Guo, S. (2020). Study on the allocation of digital education resources under policy orientation. Modern Educational Technology, (08), 73–79.
  • Liu, R., & Chen, C. (2021). A quantitative study of China’s educational informatization policy from the perspective of policy tools: A textual analysis based on the “key points of educational informatization work” from 2013-2020. China Education Informatization, (09), 1–5.
  • Liu-Schuppener, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence and digitalization in China’s education system: A systematic analysis of the policy framework and underlying strategies. DuEPublico 2. https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/78369
  • Magunje, C., & Chigona, A. (2021). E-learning policy and technology-enhanced flexible curriculum delivery in developing contexts: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v9i2.447
  • Mansvelt, J., Suddaby, G., O’Hara, D., & Gilbert, A. (2009). Professional development: Assuring quality in e-learning policy and practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910970641
  • McNaught, C., & Vogel, D. (2006). The fit between e-learning policy and institutional culture. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(4), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2006.011341
  • Mee, A. (2007). E-learning and change in higher education: The policy environment. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 1(1), 249–262.
  • MOE. (2022). Outline of education informatization II. China Ministry of Education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_164/202202/t20220208_597666.html
  • Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  • Moore, J. C. (2012). A synthesis of Sloan-C effective practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i1.238
  • O’Connor, K. (2014). MOOCs, institutional policy and change dynamics in higher education. Higher Education, 68, 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9735-z
  • Owston, R. (2013). Blended learning policy and implementation: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.03.002
  • Parchoma, G. (2006). A proposed e-learning policy field for the academy. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 230–240.
  • Passey, D., Breiter, A., & Visscher, A. (2006). Home-school ICT experiences: Influences and issues. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 385–401.
  • Picciano, A. G. (2016). Online education policy and practice: The past, present, and future of the digital university. Routledge.
  • Pittard, V. (2004). Evidence for e-learning policy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200179
  • Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1
  • Rosenberg, W. J. (2007). What’s needed for e-learning to take off?: Designing a suitable national and institutional policy runway. Journal of Distance Learning, 11(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1
  • Roumell Erichsen, E., & Salajan, F. D. (2014). A comparative analysis of e-learning policy formulation in the European Union and the United States: Discursive convergence and divergence. Comparative Education Review, 58(1), 135–165. https://doi.org/10.1086/674095
  • Roushan, G., Holley, D., & Biggins, D. (2016). The kaleidoscope of voices: An action research approach to informing institutional e-learning policy. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(5), 293–300.
  • Salajan, F. D. (2007). The European e-learning programme(s): Between rhetoric and reality. European Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.4.364
  • Salajan, F. D. (2019). Building a policy space via mainstreaming ICT in European education: The European digital education area (re)visited. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12362
  • Salajan, F. D., & Roumell, E. A. (2016). Two decades of e-learning policy evolution at EU level: Motivations, institutions and instruments. European Journal of Education, 51(3), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12144
  • Suddaby, G., & Milne, J. (2008). Developing and implementing e-learning guidelines within a national tertiary education system. Campus Wide Information Systems, 25(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740810866602
  • Sun, X. (2011). Analysis of problems and policy research on educational informatization in universities [Master’s thesis, East China Normal University].
  • Wallace, L., & Young, J. (2010). Implementing blended learning: Policy implications for universities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4), Article 7.
  • Wang, J. (2018). Research on the development of informatization policy for foreign language education in Chinese universities [Doctoral dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University].
  • Wang, L., & Jiang, R. (2021). Analysis and insights of e-learning policy in the United States. Teaching and Management, (15), 120–124.
  • Wang, Q., & Chen, H. (2022). Bridging the digital divide: A comparative analysis of educational informatization policies in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Comparative Education, (04), 42–57.
  • Wu, M., & Wu, X. (2018). The logic of the era of Education Informatization 2.0: An interpretation of the “action plan for Education Informatization 2.0.” Distance Education Journal, (04), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2018.04.002
  • Yu, J., Wang, X., & Hou, Y. (2020). Development trends, problems, and countermeasures of informatization in foreign language education policies in Chinese universities. Journal of Dalian University, (02), 111–116.
  • Zhang, L., & Liang, Y. (2024). Influencing factors and optimization strategies for the implementation of informatization policy in Chinese higher education. Journal of Jilin University, (02), 220–235, 240. https://doi.org/10.15939/j.jujsse.2024.02.zz3
  • Zhang, Q. (2016). Innovation in educational informatization policy and its modern significance. Journal of Education, (03), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.16215/j.cnki.cn44-1371/g4.2016.03.003
  • Zhu, T. (2022). New trends and key new technologies in global higher education informatization in the post-pandemic era: Interpretation of the “2021 horizon report (teaching and learning edition).” China Education Informatization, (02), 58–66.
  • Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Zhai, X., & Chen, W. (2021). Analysis and insights of China’s educational informatization policy (2000-2020) based on big data of texts. Journal of Beijing Institute of Education, (05), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.16398/j.cnki.jbjieissn1008-228x.2021.05.008