Personalities of Brands Using Social Media Efficiently
Ozgul Dagli 1 *
More Detail
1 Uskudar University, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 211-223.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2619
OPEN ACCESS 2025 Views 1305 Downloads Published online: 10 Oct 2017
ABSTRACT
Brand value means combination of constituents consisting of its functional benefit, emotional benefit, personal benefit and commitment supports, and brand characteristics has an important place among these constituents. Success and role of social media in reflecting characteristics of brands is an inarguable truth. In this study, the brands in social media preferred the most by young consumers that frequently uses social media are analyzed and personality characteristics of these brands are addressed. Findings of the study contain an evaluation on personality characteristics of the top three most preferred brands as Turkcell, Turk Telekom and Mavi Jeans. In the evaluation on these 3 brands, Aaker's (1997) scale where he associates brands with human-specific personality characteristics and used as the most applied scale in assessing brand personality has been used as the assessment tool. Finding of the study present personality profiles of the most popular GSM and fashion brands of social media.
CITATION
Dagli, O. (2017). Personalities of Brands Using Social Media Efficiently.
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(4), 211-223.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2619
REFERENCES
- Aaker, David A (1991). Managing Brand Value: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name, The Free Press Yay. ABD.
- Aaker David A.; Alexander L. Biel (1993). Brand Equity&Advertising: advertising’s role in building strong brands, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Yay, ABD.
- Aaker, J., (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), Aralık, s. 347
- Anbang Xu; Haibin Liu; Liang Gou; Rama Akkiraju; Jalal Mahmud; Vibha Sinha; Yuheng Hu; Mu Qiao (2016). "Predicting Perceived Brand Personality with Social Media", Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2016), USA: 436-445.
- Barrick, Murray R. Ve Michael K. Mount (1991), “The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Personnel Psychology, 44: 1-26.
- Bati, Uğur (2015). Marka Yönetimi: vazgeçme çağında “yüksek sadakat markaları yaratmak”. Alfa Yay. İstanbul.
- Dölarslan, Emre Şahin (2012). “Bir Marka Kişiliği Ölçeği Değerlendirmesi” Ankara Üniv. SBF Dergisi, Cilt.67, no.2. 1-28.
- Keller, Kevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, And Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity “, Journal of Marketing, , Vol. 57, no. 1.
- Low, George S.; Charles W. Lamb Jr (2000), “The Measurement and Dimensionality of Brand Associations”, Journal of Product &Brand Management, vol.9, no:6, , s.350-368
- Özgüven, N., Karataş, E., (2010), “Genç Tüketicilerin Marka Kişiliği Algılamalarının Cinsiyete Göre Değerlendirilmesi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 11, s. 140
- Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski Ve Deborah J. Maclnnis (1986), "Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management," Journal of Marketing, 50 (4): 621-35.
- Torlak, Ömer; Cevahir Kurt; (2005); “Kola Markası Kişiliklerinin Üniversite Öğrencileri Tarafından Algılanması”, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 6, Sayı 2: 15-31
- Tosun, Nurhan Babür (2014). Marka Yönetimi, 2. Baskı, Beta Yay. İstanbul.
- Uztuğ, Ferruh (2008), Markan Kadar Konuş:Marka İletişim Stratejileri, Kapital Medya A.Ş. yay., Ankara.
- VURAL, Z. BERİL AKINCI; MİKAİL BAT, (2010). “Yeni Bir İletişim Ortamı Olarak Sosyal Medya: Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesine Yönelik Bir araştırma” Journal of Yasar University, 20(5):3348‐3382.
- YENER DURSUN, (2013). “Marka Çağrışım Unsurlarının Marka Kişiliği Üzerine Etkisi” Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges”, May. 89-103.
- SES 2012, MediaCom presentation. (https://www.slideshare.net/hmehme/ses2012?next_slideshow=1) 27.09.2017.