Personalization by means of Visual Representations of Workshop Spaces in Cyprus Turkish Community

Senih Cavusoglu 1 *, Zehra Ongul 1, Banu Tevfikler Cavusoglu 1
More Detail
1 Eastern Mediterranean University, North Cyprus
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp. 117-130. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2357
OPEN ACCESS   1721 Views   1261 Downloads   Published online: 24 Apr 2018
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Space is a living entity in regards to life, speaking loud about its inhabitants. In this study, individual features of occupants as an effective factor in the generation of space is addressed. Interpreting individualization of space through values like identity, culture, lifestyle of the inhabitants is aimed. In this sense, samples from workshops that once used to have an important place in the cultural fabric of Cyprus community, but now are almost extinct, have been chosen. Thus, spatial values by way of workshop types for varying works have been set forth to realize a space-character analysis towards the concept of individualization of space. It is aimed to reveal the ‘flavors’ of space belonging to life, derived from workshop samples that show existence as a true character by the fact that they exactly overlap with the occupants’ socio-psychological state and come to life as a living entity in parallel to the motion of the business. Evaluations have been accomplished via visual representations from photographs as the closest ways of sensing the space.
Keywords: personalization, visual representations, Cyprus Turkish community

CITATION

Cavusoglu, S., Ongul, Z., & Tevfikler Cavusoglu, B. (2018). Personalization by means of Visual Representations of Workshop Spaces in Cyprus Turkish Community. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.12973/ojcmt/2357

REFERENCES

  • Altman, I. (1975). The environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Alver, K. (n.d.). Space in Story, Story in Space. Int 1 http://www.hece.com.tr/17.heceoyku.ozel2.htm
  • Duyan, E. (n.d.). Blind Architecture. Int 2 http://www.istanbultasarimportali.com/link.asp?cat=mimari&id=46
  • Foucault, M. (1999). Archeology of Knowledge. (translator: Veli Urhan) Birey Yayıncılık.
  • Güvenç, B. (1996). Humans and Culture. Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Kasapoğlu, E. (2004). Reflections of Mediterranean Culture on Mediterranean City. Medi3ology, International Gazimağusa Symposium, U. U. Dağlı, N. Doratlı, Ş. Ö. Hoşkara, & P. Uluçay (Ed.), Gazimağusa, 273-279.
  • Kalyoncu, G. (2006). Investigation of Personalization and Space Loyalty in a Dormitory Space: İTÜ Ayşe_Zeynep Birkan Dormitory Case (Master Thesis), İstanbul Technical University.
  • Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1976). Freedom of Choice and Behavior in a Physical Setting, Environmental Psychology: People and Their Physical Settings, (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 170-181.
  • Rapoport, A. (1980). Cross-Cultural Aspects of Environmental Design. In Altman, Rapoport and Wohlwill, 7-46.
  • Rapoport, A. (2004). Culture Architecture Design. Yapı yayın (Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları).
  • Rasmussen, S. E. (1994). Lived in Architecture. Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place And Identity Processes, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205-220.
  • Uygur, N. (2003). Culture Theory. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Wells, M. M. (2000). Office clutter of meaningful personal displays; the role of office personalisation in employee and organizational well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 239-255.