Social Media as a Dialogical Communication Tool: Izmir Metropolitan Municipality Example

Zekiye Beril Akıncı Vural 1, Gül Coşkun Değirmen 2 * , Sezen Ünüvar 3
More Detail
1 Faculty of Communication, Ege University, TURKEY
2 Serik Faculty of Business Administration, Akdeniz University, TURKEY
3 Institute of Social Sciences, Ege University, TURKEY
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 12, Issue 2, Article No: e202210. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/11557
OPEN ACCESS   2146 Views   2005 Downloads   Published online: 14 Jan 2022
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms enable organizations to deliver their messages to their target audiences much faster and more economically than traditional media channels. This new communication area also offers corporations unique opportunities by providing a dialogue-based communication opportunity with their stakeholders. The aim of this study is to examine how the social media accounts of İzmir Metropolitan Municipality, the third biggest city of Turkey, is used in terms of dialogical communication. Within this context, the article discusses how much the official social media accounts of İzmir Metropolitan Municipality include dialogic principles and how much dialogic communication with followers is achieved. Within the framework of the dialogical communication criteria developed by Kent and Taylor (1998), quantitative content analysis was carried out for the Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook accounts of the said municipality. The social media accounts of the municipality with a high follower rate were found to be successful in dialogic principles that usefulness of information, ensuring revisits, ease of interface and keeping visitors. However, the communication with the followers was found insufficient in Twitter in terms of the dialogic loop principle, and unsuccessful in Facebook and Instagram. The fact that the social media accounts of the İzmir Metropolitan Municipality are not supportive of the dialogue gives the corporation a negative image. For this reason, it is of great importance for the corporation to fulfill the principle of the dialogical loop as soon as possible.
Keywords: dialogical communication, social media, public relations, Izmir

CITATION

Akıncı Vural, Z. B., Coşkun Değirmen, G., & Ünüvar, S. (2022). Social Media as a Dialogical Communication Tool: Izmir Metropolitan Municipality Example. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(2), e202210. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/11557

REFERENCES

  • Capriotti, P., & Kuklinski, H. P. (2012). Assessing dialogic communication through the Internet in Spanish museums. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 619-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.005
  • Capriotti, P., & Losada-Díaz, J. C. (2018). Facebook as a dialogic communication tool at the most visited museums of the world. El Profesional de la Información [The Information Professional], 27(3), 642-650. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.may.17
  • Çetintaş, H. B. (2019). Diyalojik paydaş iletişimi için Twitter kullanımı [Using Twitter for dialogic stakeholder communication]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences], 19(3), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.631980
  • Engin, E., & Akgöz, B. E. (2016). Belediyelerin web sitelerinin diyalojik iletişim açısından analizi [Analysis of municipalities' websites in terms of dialogic communication]. Atatürk İletişim Dergisi [Ataturk Communication Journal], (10), 91-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/atauniiletisim/issue/33795/374300
  • Gomez Vasquez, L. M., & Soto Velez, I. (2011). Los medios sociales como una herramienta estratégica para la comunicación corporativa [Social media as a strategic tool for corporate communication]. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas [International Journal of Public Relations], 1(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-2-2011-09-157-174
  • Grunig, J. E. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. PRism, 6(2), 1-19. http://praxis.massey.ac.nz/prism_on-line_journ.html
  • Kent, M. L., & Lane, A. B. (2017). A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 568-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.017
  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X
  • Köseoğlu, Ö., & Köker, N. E. (2014). Türk üniversiteleri Twİtter’ı diyalogsal iletişim açısından nasıl kullanıyor: Beş Türk üniversitesi üzerine bir içerik analizi [How Turkish universities use Twitter for dialogic communication: A content analysis on five Turkish universities]. Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition, 4(8). https://globalmediajournaltr.yeditepe.edu.tr/sites/default/files/koseoglu-koker.pdf
  • Ledingham, J. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_4
  • Okmeydan, C. K. (2019). Diyalojik iletişimin sosyal müşteri ilişkileri yönetimine katkısı: Kurumsal markalar üzerine bir araştırma [Contribution of dialogic communication to social customer relationship management: A research on corporate brands] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ege University.
  • Özdemir, B. P., & Yamanoğlu, M. A. (2010). Türkiye’deki sivil toplum kuruluşları web sitelerinin diyalojik iletişim kapasiteleri üzerine bir inceleme [An investigation of dialogical communication capacities of non govermental organizations’ web sites in Turkey]. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Ankara University Journal of Social Sciences], 1(2), 3-36. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3285184
  • Şengöz, A., & Eroğlu, E. (2017). Örgütlerde sosyal medya kullanımı: Sosyal medya algıları, amaçları ve kullanım alışkanlıkları [Social media use in organizations: Social media perceptions, purposes and usage habits]. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi [Gumushane University Faculty of Communication Electronic Journal], 5(1), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.19145/gumuscomm.288789
  • Şimşek, G. (2016). Büyükşehir belediye başkanlarının diyalojik iletişim çerçevesinde sosyal medya uygulamaları [Social media applications of metropolitan mayors within the framework of dialogic communication]. Journal of International Social Research, 9(46), 829-839. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20164622646
  • Solmaz, B., & Görkemli, H. N. (2012). Büyükşehir belediyeleri ve sosyal medya kullanımı [Metropolitan municipalities and use of social media]. Akdeniz Iletisim [Mediterranean Communication], (18). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akil/issue/48077/607855
  • Thelen, P. D., & Men, R. L. (2018). Strategic use of Facebook for public engagement in higher education institutions. Public Relations Journal, 12(2), 1-27.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu [Turkish Language Society]. (2020). Diyalog [Dialog]. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  • Wang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Dialogic communication on social media: How organizations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183
  • Wierzbicka, A. (2006). The concept of ‘dialogue’ in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective. Discourse Studies, 8(5), 675-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606067334
  • Wirtz, J. G., & Zimbres, T. M. (2018). A systematic analysis of research applying ‘principles of dialogic communication’ to organizational websites, blogs, and social media: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(1-2), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455146
  • Yağmurlu, A. (2013). Diyalojik iletişim çerçevesinden Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi sosyal medya uygulamaları [Ankara Metropolitan Municipality social media applications within the framework of dialogic communication]. Selçuk İletişim [Selcuk Communication], 8(1), 95-115. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/josc/issue/19026/200532
  • Yeniçıktı, N. T. (2016). Hakla ilişkiler aracı olarak Instagram: Sosyal medya kullanan 50 şirket üzerine bir araştırma [Instagram as a public relations tool: A study on 50 companies using social media]. Selçuk İletişim [Selcuk Communication], 9(2), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.18094/si.84410