Social media users trust in their most frequently used social media site

Daniel M. Eveleth 1 * , Robert W. Stone 1, Lori J. Baker-Eveleth 1
More Detail
1 University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 14, Issue 4, Article No: e202445. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14796
OPEN ACCESS   81 Views   147 Downloads   Published online: 11 Jul 2024
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

As users increasingly turn to social media as a source for news and other information, greater understanding is needed about the factors that affect their perceptions of the social media sites, where they seek information. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of perceived social media benefits and knowledge of privacy-protection practices on users’ trust in information on social media. Results indicate that users’ trust is, in part, a function of their perceptions of the benefits of social media and their knowledge of privacy-protection practices. Perceived benefits and knowledge of privacy practices each positively influenced trust. In addition, privacy invasion experiences positively influenced risk aversion and privacy concerns, which in turn had positive influences on privacy-protection knowledge. Interestingly, this result shows that users’ privacy concerns and risk aversion have a positive effect on trust, indirectly, through users’ efforts to gain greater control of their privacy by increasing their knowledge about privacy protection practices.

CITATION

Eveleth, D. M., Stone, R. W., & Baker-Eveleth, L. J. (2024). Social media users trust in their most frequently used social media site. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), e202445. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14796

REFERENCES

  • Abdul-Rahim, R., Bohari, S. A., Aman, A., & Awang, Z. (2022). Benefit–risk perceptions of FinTech adoption for sustainability from bank consumers’ perspective: The moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 8357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148357
  • Adhikari, K., & Panda, R. K. (2018). Users’ information privacy concerns and privacy protection behaviors in social networks. Journal of Global Marketing, 31(2), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2017.1412552
  • Adjin-Tettey, T. D., & Amenaghawon, F. (2024). Countering the threats of dis/misinformation: Fact-checking practices of students of two universities in West Africa. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(1), Article e202409. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14134
  • Ahmadi, M., & Wohn, D. Y. (2018). The antecedents of incidental news exposure on social media. Social Media + Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118772827
  • Ahmed, S., & Masood, M. (2024). Assessing the effects of privacy concerns on social media-driven political discussions and participation: A comparative study of Asian and Western contexts. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241252026
  • Alfred, J. J. R., & Wong, S. P. (2022). The relationship between the perception of social media credibility and political engagement in social media among Generation Z. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 2(2), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2022.2.2.2
  • Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 1085-1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x
  • Alkis, A., & Kose, T. (2022). Privacy concerns in consumer e-commerce activities and response to social media advertising: Empirical evidence from Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, Article 107412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107412
  • Amuta, A. O., Jacobs, W., Barry, A. E., Popoola, O. A., & Crosslin, K. (2016). Gender differences in type 2 diabetes risk perception, attitude, and protective health behaviors: A study of overweight and obese college students. American Journal of Health Education, 47(5), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2016.1203836
  • Auxier, B., Anderson, M., Gramlich, J., Schaeffer, K., & Vogels, E. A. (2021). Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
  • Babu, P. V., Agrawal, G., Mohideen, A. S., & Anand, B. (2024). Users’ perceived risks and challenges of FinTech adoption in India: An empirical investigation. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i1.524
  • Baker-Eveleth, L., Stone, R., & Eveleth, D. (2022). Understanding social media users’ privacy-protection behaviors. Information & Computer Security, 30(3), 324-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-07-2021-0099
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith, & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9-35). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0002
  • Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2016). Do context and personality matter? Trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online. Information & Management, 53(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.08.001
  • Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding fake news consumption: A review. Social Sciences, 9(10), Article 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185
  • Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276
  • Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004
  • Boerman, S. C., Strycharz, J., & Smit, E. G. (2024). How can we increase privacy protection behavior? A longitudinal experiment testing three intervention strategies. Communication Research, 51(2), 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231177786
  • Bright, L. F., Logan, K., & Lim, H. S. (2022). Social media fatigue and privacy: An exploration of antecedents to consumers’ concerns regarding the security of their personal information on social media platforms. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2051097
  • Chen, M., Huang, X., & Qi, X. (2024). To disclose or to protect? Predicting social media users’ behavioral intention toward privacy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(6), 2091-2119. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2023-0337
  • Cheng, X., Fu, S., & de Vreede, G.-J. (2017). Understanding trust influencing factors in social media communication: A qualitative study. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.009
  • Chung, K.-C., Chen, C.-H., Tsai, H.-H., & Chuang, Y.-H. (2021). Social media privacy management strategies: A SEM analysis of user privacy behaviors. Computer Communications, 174, 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.04.012
  • Cui, M., Ding, F., & Cai, K. (2024). The influence of self-efficacy of college students in privacy protection and behavior in social networking context. Scientific and Social Research, 6(3), 126-143. https://doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v6i3.6445
  • Degirmenci, K. (2020). Mobile users’ information privacy concerns and the role of app permission requests. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.010
  • Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
  • Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In Proceedings of the AMCIS 2007.
  • Eckel, C. C., El-Gamal, M. A., & Wilson, R. K. (2009). Risk loving after the storm: A Bayesian-network study of Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(2), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.012
  • Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
  • Feldkamp, J. (2021). The rise of TikTok: The evolution of a social media platform during COVID-19. In C. Hovestadt, J. Recker, J. Richter, & K. Werder (Eds.), Digital responses to COVID-19: Digital innovation, transformation, and entrepreneurship during pandemic outbreaks (pp. 73-85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66611-8_6
  • Gainous, J., Abbott, J. P., & Wagner, K. M. (2019). Traditional versus internet media in a restricted information environment: How trust in the medium matters. Political Behavior, 41, 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9456-6
  • George, J. F. (2024). Discovering why people believe disinformation about healthcare. PLoS ONE, 19(3), Article e0300497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300497
  • Gupta, S., & Dey, D. K. (2024). Risk perception and adoption of digital innovation in mobile stock trading. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 23(2), 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2225
  • Hair, J., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis: With readings. MacMillan Publishing Company.
  • Hajli, N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M.-O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.004
  • He, T.-S., & Hong, F. (2018). Risk breeds risk aversion. Experimental Economics, 21, 815-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9553-0
  • Herrando, C., Jimenez-Martinez, J., & Martin-De Hoyos, M. (2019). Tell me your age and I tell you what you trust: The moderating effect of generations. Internet Research, 29(4), 799-817. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2017-0135
  • Hong, W., Chan, F. K., & Thong, J. Y. (2019). Drivers and inhibitors of internet privacy concern: A multidimensional development theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 539-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04237-1
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  • Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838-1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003
  • Hsu, H.-M. (2016). Does privacy threat matter in mobile health service? From health belief model perspective [Paper presentation]. The PACIS 2016. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/65/
  • Hwang, Y. (2005). Investigating enterprise systems adoption: Uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000532
  • Igbaria, M., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1992). Determinants of MIS employees’ turnover intentions: A structural equation model. Communications of ACM, 35(2), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1145/129630.129631
  • Ioannou, A., Tussyadiah, I., & Marshan, A. (2021). Dispositional mindfulness as an antecedent of privacy concerns: A protection motivation theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 38(10), 1766-1778. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21529
  • Isti’anah, M., Suhud, U., & Usman, O. (2022). Analyzing decision-making factors for using social media: The role of trust and information sharing. European Journal of Management Issues, 30(3), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.15421/192213
  • Jordaan, Y., & Van Heerden, G. (2017). Online privacy-related predictors of Facebook usage intensity. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.048
  • Jurkowitz, M., & Gottfried, J. (2022). Twitter is the go-to social media site for US journalists, but not for the public. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2480855/twitter-is-the-go-to-social-media-site-for-us/3503030/
  • Karlsen, R., & Aalberg, T. (2023). Social media and trust in news: An experimental study of the effect of Facebook on news story credibility. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 144-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1945938
  • Kasilingam, D. L. (2020). Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society, 62, Article 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280
  • Kenny, G., & Connolly, R. (2016). Drivers of health information privacy concern: A comparison study [Paper presentation]. The ACIS.
  • Kesharwani, A., & Singh Bisht, S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(4), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321211236923
  • Kim, Y.-I., & Lee, J. (2014). The long-run impact of a traumatic experience on risk aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.009
  • Koksalmis, G. H., Arpacı, İ., & Koksalmis, E. (2022). Predicting the intention to use bitcoin: An extension of technology acceptance model (TAM) with perceived risk theory. In M. Al-Emran, & K. Shaalan (Eds.), Recent innovations in artificial intelligence and smart applications (pp. 105-120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14748-7_6
  • Koohikamali, M., Peak, D. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (2017). Beyond self-disclosure: Disclosure of information about others in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.012
  • Kordzadeh, N., & Warren, J. (2014). Communicating personal health information in virtual health communities: A theoretical framework [Paper presentation]. The 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.85
  • Lee, H. (2020). Home IoT resistance: Extended privacy and vulnerability perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 49, Article 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101377
  • Lee, J., Britt, B. C., & Kanthawala, S. (2023). Taking the lead in misinformation-related conversations in social media networks during a mass shooting crisis. Internet Research, 33(2), 638-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-02-2021-0120
  • Lin, K.-Y., Chien, C.-F., & Kerh, R. (2016). UNISON framework of data-driven innovation for extracting user experience of product design of wearable devices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99, 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.023
  • Liu, X., Wang, L., Liu, X., & Zhai, X. (2024). The impact of privacy violations on subsequent consumer preferences for anthropomorphized products. Journal of Business Research, 174, Article 114505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114505
  • Lwin, M. O., Wirtz, J., & Stanaland, A. J. (2016). The privacy dyad: Antecedents of promotion- and prevention-focused online privacy behaviors and the mediating role of trust and privacy concern. Internet Research, 26(4), 919-941. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0134
  • Malik, S., Chadhar, M., Vatanasakdakul, S., & Chetty, M. (2021). Factors affecting the organizational adoption of blockchain technology: Extending the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework in the Australian context. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169404
  • Martinko, M. J., Zmud, R. W., & Henry, J. W. (1996). An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(5), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492996120085a
  • Meier, Y., Meinert, J., & Krämer, N. (2021). Investigating factors that affect the adoption of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps. A privacy calculus perspective. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000040
  • Mican, D., Sitar-Tăut, D.-A., & Moisescu, O.-I. (2020). Perceived usefulness: A silver bullet to assure user data availability for online recommendation systems. Decision Support Systems, 139, Article 113420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113420
  • Milne, G. R., & Culnan, M. J. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20009
  • Mohamed, N., & Ahmad, I. H. (2012). Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2366-2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.008
  • Muliadi, M., Muhammadiah, M. u., Amin, K. F., Kaharuddin, K., Junaidi, J., Pratiwi, B. I., & Fitriani, F. (2022). The information sharing among students on social media: The role of social capital and trust. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(4), 823-840. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0285
  • Mutimukwe, C., Viberg, O., Oberg, L. M., & Cerratto-Pargman, T. (2022). Students’ privacy concerns in learning analytics: Model development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 932-951. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13234
  • NA. (2022). Frequency of using selected news sources among millennials in the United States as of August 2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1010456/united-states-millennials-news-consumption/
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill.
  • Oden, A., & Porter, L. (2023). The kids are online: Teen social media use, civic engagement, and affective polarization. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186364
  • Olan, F., Jayawickrama, U., Arakpogun, E. O., Suklan, J., & Liu, S. (2024). Fake news on social media: The impact on society. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10242-z
  • Orszaghova, E. & Blank, G., (2024). Does the type of privacy-protective behaviour matter? An analysis of online privacy protective action and motivation, Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2334906
  • Ortiz, J., Chih, W. H., & Tsai, F.-S. (2018). Information privacy, consumer alienation, and lurking behavior in social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.005
  • Park, S., & Lee, J. Y. (2023). Incidental news exposure on Facebook and its relation to trust in news. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231158823
  • Primack, B. A., Karim, S. A., Shensa, A., Bowman, N., Knight, J., & Sidani, J. E. (2019). Positive and negative experiences on social media and perceived social isolation. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(6), 859-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118824196
  • Rainer, R. K., & Harrison, A. W. (1993). Toward development of the end user computing construct in a university setting. Decision Sciences, 24(6), 1187-1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00510.x
  • Rzewnicki, D. I., Shensa, A., Levenson, J. C., Primack, B. A., & Sidani, J. E. (2020). Associations between positive and negative social media experiences and sleep disturbance among young adults. Sleep Health, 6(5), 671-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2020.02.013
  • Salem, H., & Stephany, F. (2023). Wikipedia: A challenger’s best friend? Utilizing information-seeking behaviour patterns to predict US congressional elections. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1), 174-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1942953
  • Shearer, E., & Grieco, E. (2019). Americans are wary of the role social media sites play in delivering the news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2019/10/02/americans-are-wary-of-the-role-social-media-sites-play-in-delivering-the-news/
  • Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/249477
  • Smith-Frigerio, S. (2021). “You are not alone”: Linking peer support to information and resources for mental health concerns in advocacy groups’ social media messaging. Health Communication, 36(14), 1980-1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1808415
  • Stubenvoll, M., & Binder, A. (2024). Is knowledge power? Testing whether knowledge affects chilling effects and privacy-protective behaviors using browser histories. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, Article 107949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107949
  • Sutarno, K., Estadimas, B., Taliya, A., Wardoyo, D., Hapsari, I. C., Hidayanto, A. N., & Nazief, B. A. (2020). Factors influencing user intention in opening personal data on social media [Paper presentation]. The 2020 5th International Conference on Informatics and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288614
  • Tejedor, S., Romero-Rodriguez, L., & Gracia-Villar, M. (2024). Unveiling the truth: A systematic review of fact-checking and fake news research in social sciences. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(2), Article e202427. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14455
  • Thamarapani, D., & Rockmore, M. (2022). The stability and evolution of risk attitudes and time preferences after a disaster. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 70, Article 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102791
  • Tu, F. (2024). Empowering social media users: Nudge toward self-engaged verification for improved truth and sharing discernment. Journal of Communication, 74(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae007
  • Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127
  • van der Schyff, K., & Flowerday, S. (2023). The mediating role of perceived risks and benefits when self-disclosing: A study of social media trust and FoMO. Computers & Security, 126, Article 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.103071
  • Vrhovec, S., Bernik, I., & Markelj, B. (2023). Explaining information seeking intentions: Insights from a Slovenian social engineering awareness campaign. Computers & Security, 125, Article 103038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.103038
  • Warner-Søderholm, G., Bertsch, A., Sawe, E., Lee, D., Wolfe, T., Meyer, J., Engel, J., & Fatilua, U. N. (2018). Who trusts social media? Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.026
  • Wiegard, R.-B., & Breitner, M. H. (2019). Smart services in healthcare: A risk-benefit-analysis of pay-as-you-live services from customer perspective in Germany. Electronic Markets, 29(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0274-1
  • Xiao, X., Borah, P., & Su, Y. (2021). The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 977-992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521998025
  • Yamamoto, M., & Morey, A. C. (2019). Incidental news exposure on social media: A campaign communication mediation approach. Social Media + Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119843619
  • Yang, H. C. (2012). Young American consumers’ prior negative experience of online disclosure, online privacy concerns, and privacy protection behavioral intent. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 25, 179-202. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/123
  • Youn, S. (2009). Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(3), 389-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2009.01146.x