Sojourners Inter-Cultural Communication Competence in Ethiopia: The Case of Amhara National Regional State (ANRS)
Mekonnen Hailemariam Zikargae 1 *
More Detail
1 Bahir Dar University, Nigeria
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 88-106.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2549
OPEN ACCESS 1575 Views 1331 Downloads Published online: 26 Apr 2016
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research focuses on the sojourners inter-cultural communication competence at the highest tourist destination sites in ANRS,Ethiopia. Qualitative research methodology is employed. Interview and observation are the major techniques to elicit the data. This data is described qualitatively. Thus, the research indicates that there are some opportunities and challenges among sojourners while sojourning and communicating across another culture. They are competent enough during their stay at the sites. But there are some problems of language with the ordinary people as well as misunderstanding and miscommunication. However, the sojourners try to use different mechanisms to adjust themselves with in the new settings to endure with some of the challenges.
CITATION
Zikargae, M. H. (2016). Sojourners Inter-Cultural Communication Competence in Ethiopia: The Case of Amhara National Regional State (ANRS).
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(2), 88-106.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2549
REFERENCES
- ------------. (204). Crossing cultural barriers. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
- ------------. (2005). On Empirical Research of Intercultural Communication. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 37(5), 323–327.
- Bachman, L. (2004). Research Guidelines in TESOL: Alternative perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 723–734.
- Chen, G. M., &Starosta, W. J. (1997). Foundations of intercultural communication. Needham Height, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.
- Gao, Y. H., Li, L. C., &Lü, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes,20(1),114.
- Gudykunst.(Ed).2003.Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks:
- Gui, S. C., & Ning, C. Y. (1997). Linguistics research methods. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
- Harman, R., & Briggs, N. (1991). SIETAR Survey: Perceived contributions of the social sciences to intercultural communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15(1), 19–28.
- Hart, W. (1999). Interdisciplinary Influence in the Study of Intercultural Relations: A citation analysis of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations.
- Hu, W. Z. (1999). Outline of Intercultural Communication. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
- Korzenny, F., &Korzenny, B. A. G. (1984). Quantitative Approaches: An overview. In W. B. Gudykunst, & Y. Y. Kim (Eds.), Methods for intercultural Communication research (pp. 85–94). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Malhotra, N. K. (1993). Marketing research: An applied orientation. New Jersey: PrenticeHall. Inc.
- McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (2000). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. Beijing, China: Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
- Mekonnen Hailemariam. (2010). Cognition and Affect in Cross-Cultural Communication: The Case of Addis Ababa University.U.S.A:VDMVerlag.
- Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods – qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Y. Hu, W. Fan / International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35. (2011) 554– 566
- Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
- Samovar et al. (2000).Communication between Cultures. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2004).Communicating across Cultures. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Wiseman, R. L. (2002). Intercultural Communication Competence. In W. B. Gudykunst, &B. Mody (Eds.), International and Intercultural Communication (2nd ed., pp. 207- 224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.