The Pictures in Our Heads

Jennifer Kowalewski 1 *
More Detail
1 Georgia Southern University, USA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 148-168. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2587
OPEN ACCESS   1987 Views   1027 Downloads   Published online: 26 Apr 2017
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Most research has focused on how conventional news influenced second-level agenda setting, but more research needs to investigate how humorous news might affect attribute agenda setting, and compare those effects with conventional news. In this experiment, participants received media messages with the same information structured as either conventional news or humorous news to examine how the structure of the media message might affect second-level agenda setting. The results indicated people accepted the attributes of issues related to certain issues when it was presented as a humorous news program. However, conventional news was more successful in second-level agenda setting as compared to humorous news, meaning people accepted attributes of issues more when presented as a conventional news program.
Keywords: Attribute Agenda Setting, Humorous News, Conventional News, Experiment

CITATION

Kowalewski, J. (2017). The Pictures in Our Heads. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(2), 148-168. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2587

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the ‘new’ news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29, 180-207.
  • Baumgartner, J.C., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341-367.
  • Dearing J. W. & Rogers E. M. (1996). Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
  • Evatt, D., & Ghanem, S. (2001). Building a scale to measure salience. Paper presented to the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Rome, Italy.
  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
  • Holbert, L. R., Hmielowski, J., Jain, P., Lather, J., & Morey, A. (2011). Adding nuance to the study of political humor effects: Experimental research on juvenalian satire versus horatian satire. American Behaviaoral Scientist, 55, 187-211.
  • Holbert, R. L., Lambe, J. L., Dudo, A. D., & Carlton, K. A. (2007). Primacy effects of The Daily Show and National TV News Viewing: Young viewers, political gratifications, and internal political self-efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 20-38.
  • Holbert, R. L., Tchernev, J. M., Walther, W. O., Esralew, S. E., & Benski, K. (2013). Young voter perceptions of political satire as persuasion: a focus on perceived influence, persuasive intent, and message strength. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 170-186.
  • Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1986). More than meets the eye: TV news, priming, and public evaluations of the president. In G. Comstock (Ed.) Public Communication and Behavior, Volume 1 (pp. 135-163). Syracuse, New York: Academic Press, Inc.
  • Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Kohut, A. (2007 April 15). What Americans Know: 1989-2007: Public Knowledge of Current Affairs Little Changed by News and Information. Retrieved from http://peoplepress.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=319 on March 1, 2008.
  • Kolbert, E. (2004, April 19). Stooping to conquer: Why candidates need to make fun of themselves. The New Yorker.
  • Kowalewski, J. (2013). “It’s Not Just a Laughing Matter: How Entertainment News Programs Influence the Transfer of the Media’s Agenda to the Public’s Agenda Similarly to Traditional Hard News.” In T. Johnson (eds.) Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication (New York, N.Y.: Routlege).
  • Kowalewski, J. (2013). “Does Humor Matter? An Analysis of How Hard News versus Entertainment News Styles Influence the Agenda-Setting Effects” Southwestern Mass Communication Journal.
  • Kowalewski, J., & Stewart, D. (2013). “To Laugh or Not to Laugh: How Different Versions of News Stories Interact with Cynicism and Efficacy to Impact Individuals’ Acceptance of the Media Agenda.” Southwestern Mass Communication Journal.
  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  • McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557.
  • McCombs, M., Llama, J. P., & Lopez-Escobar, E. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 77-92.
  • McCombs, M., Llama, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703-717.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
  • Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28(6), 689-717.
  • Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science 44(2), 301-315.
  • Morris, J. S. (2009). The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and audience attitude change during the 2004 party convention. Political Behavior, 31, 79-102.
  • Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2006). Priming Effects of Late-Night Comedy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 198-210.
  • Nabi, R.L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29-54.
  • Polk, J., Young, D. G., Holbert, R. L. (2009). Humor complexity and political influence: An elaboration likelihood approach the effects of humor type in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17, 202-219.
  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Klinger, M. R., &Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2007). Media Priming: A Meta-Analysis. In R. W. Priess, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis. (pp. 53-80). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society 3(2&3), 297-316.
  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57, 9-20.
  • Wanta, W. (Spring 1988). The effects of dominant photographs: An agenda-setting experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 65(1), 107-111.
  • Wanta, W., & Ghanem, S. (2007). Effects of Agenda Setting. In R. W. Priess, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis. (pp. 37-52). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Weaver, D. (1994). Media agenda setting and elections: Voter involvement or alienation? Political Communication, 11, 347-356.
  • Young, D., Hoffman, L. (2009). An Experimental Exploration of Political Knowledge Acquisition from the Daily Show Versus CNN Student News. APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting. Social Science Research Network, retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1451400
  • Zillmann, D. (2000). Humor and Comedy. In D. Zillmann, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media Entertainment: The Psychology of its Appeal (pp. 37-58). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Zillmann, D., Taylor, K., & Lewis, K. (Spring 1998). News as nonfiction theater: How dispositions toward the public cast of characters affect reactions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(2), 153-170.