Understanding public opinion formation in Southeast Europe: Exploring social forces and communication dynamics

Todor Stojčevski 1 * , Urša Lamut 1 2, Erika D. Uršič 1 2 3
More Detail
1 School of Advanced Social Studies, Nova Gorica, SLOVENIA
2 Rudolfovo–Science and Technology Centre Novo Mesto, Novo Mesto, SLOVENIA
3 Faculty of Information Studies in Novo Mesto, Novo Mesto, SLOVENIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 14, Issue 4, Article No: e202455. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15171
OPEN ACCESS   549 Views   144 Downloads   Published online: 18 Sep 2024
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The article investigates the mechanisms through which social forces, networks, cognitive frames, and institutions shape public opinion in Southeast Europe via communication. Employing a qualitative approach, data was collected through synchronous focus groups conducted in six Southeast European countries. The findings reveal that social networks play a pivotal role in shaping public opinion, with organizational position and relationships influencing communication effectiveness. Cognitive frames significantly impact public perception, with entrenched beliefs guiding interpretation of information. Meanwhile, social institutions, such as language and communication rules, influence the clarity and accessibility of messages, thereby shaping public understanding. The research underscores the need for deeper research, ethical standards, and transparent communication to build and maintain public trust. Continuous engagement with the public and adaptability in communication strategies are essential for fostering mutual understanding and trust. This research emphasizes social forces’ complexity and overlapping nature in shaping public opinion and the strategic approaches required for effective communication in Southeast Europe.
Keywords: public communication, networks, cognitive frames, institutions, Southeast Europe, public opinion

CITATION

Stojčevski, T., Lamut, U., & Uršič, E. D. (2024). Understanding public opinion formation in Southeast Europe: Exploring social forces and communication dynamics. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), e202455. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15171

REFERENCES

  • Aguilar, J., & Terán, O. (2015). Social media and free knowledge: Case study-public opinion formation. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Politics and social activism: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 433–466). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9461-3.ch022
  • Alkadri, A. M., & ElKorany, A. M. (2016). Semantic feature based Arabic opinion mining using ontology. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070576
  • Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087315
  • Asgarnezhad, R., & Mohebbi, K. (2015). A comparative classification of approaches and applications in opinion mining. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 68–80.
  • Balaji, P., Haritha, D., & Nagaraju, O. (2018). An overview on opinion mining techniques and sentiment analysis. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(19), 61–69.
  • Beckert, J. (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and Society, 38, 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9082-0
  • Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372184
  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The reality of everyday life. In P. Berger, & T. Luckmann (Eds.), The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 33–42). Anchor.
  • Besednjak, T., Kolar, J., Lamut, U., & Pandiloska Jurak, A., (2023). Key policy mechanisms supporting the university-industry collaboration in the Danube Region: Case study of academic HPC Centres and SMEs. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 32(5), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-09-2022-0283
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research of education: An introductive to theories and methods (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bouras, D., Amroune, M., Bendjenna, H., & Azizi, N. (2020). Techniques and trends for fine-grained opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Recent survey. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 13(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.2174/2213275912666181227144256
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749
  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structure of the economy. Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
  • Bucur, C. (2015). Using opinion mining techniques in tourism. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1666–1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00471-2
  • Burt, M. G. (1992). The justification for applying the effective-mass approximation to microstructures. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 4(32), Article 6651. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/4/32/003
  • Cepoi, V., & Golob, T. (2017). Innovation performance in the EU comparative perspective: The interplay of social forces in the context of national innovation systems. Comparative Sociology, 16, 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341433
  • CFI. (2024). Communication skills. Corporate Finance Institute. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/management/communication/
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
  • Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. Red Globe Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9
  • Džajić Uršič, E. (2020). Morphogenesis of industrial symbiotic networks. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b16330
  • Eppler, M. J. (2006b). Managing information quality, increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive product and processes (2nd ed.). University of Lugano. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32225-6
  • Eppler, M. J. (2006a). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131
  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00132
  • Fligstein, N. (2008). The EU, European identity, and the future of Europe. Oxford University Press.
  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2015). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
  • Fourcade, M. (2007). Theories of markets and theories of society. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(8), 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207299351
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  • Gopalakrishnan, V., & Ramaswamy, C. (2017). Patient opinion mining to analyze drugs satisfaction using supervised learning. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 15(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jart.2017.02.005
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  • Hesse, M. B. (2005). Forces and fields: The concept of action at a distance in the history of physics. Courier Corporation.
  • Indeed. (2024). Communication influence skills: Definition and examples. Indeed Career Guide. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/resumes-cover-letters/communication-influence-skills
  • Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80040-2
  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper.
  • Lewis, F., & Muzzy, S. (2020). Conducting virtual focus groups. https://www.mdrc.org/work/publications/conducting-virtual-focus-groups
  • Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and society in an age of reconstruction: Studies in modern social structure. Routledge & Kegen Paul.
  • Martin, L. J. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/375201
  • Martin, L. J., & Gregg, F. (2015) Was Bourdieu a field theorist? In M. Hilgers, & E. Mangez (Eds.), Bourdieu’s theory of social fields (pp. 39–61). Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.
  • Moore, T., McKee, K., & McCoughlin, P. (2015). Online focus groups and qualitative research in the social sciences: Their merits and limitations in a study of housing and youth. People, Place and Policy Online, 9(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0009.0001.0002
  • Percy, L. (2018). Strategic integrated marketing communications (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164342
  • Percy, S. (2010). The five golden rules of communication. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sallypercy/2018/08/02/the-five-golden-rules-of-communication/?sh=7566e90518b0
  • Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Gelbukh, A. (2016). Aspect extraction for opinion mining with a deep convolutional neural network. Knowledge-Based Systems, 108, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.06.009
  • Preda, A. (2007). The sociological approach to financial markets. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(3), 506–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00512.x
  • Puerto, E., Aguilar, J., López, C., & Chávez, D. (2019). Using multilayer fuzzy cognitive maps to diagnose autism spectrum disorder. Applied Soft Computing, 75, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.034
  • Rabiah, S. (2018). Language as a tool for communication and cultural reality discloser [Paper presentation]. The 1st International Conference on Media, Communication and Culture. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/nw94m
  • Retana, J. Á. G. (2012). La educación emocional, su importancia en el proceso de aprendizaje [Emotional education, its importance in the learning process]. Revista Educación, 36(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v36i1.455
  • Rončević, B. (2012). Regional development agencies and changing social fields: Towards a sociology of regional systems of innovation. In N. Bellini, M. Danson, & H. Halkier (Eds.), Regional development agencies: The next generation? Networking, knowledge and regional policies (pp. 87–101). Routledge.
  • Rončević, B., & Besednjak Valič, T., (2022). An active society in a networked world: The cultural political economy of grand strategies. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b19930
  • Rončević, B., & Cepoi, V. (2022). Technologies and innovations in regional development: The European Union and its strategies. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17733
  • Rončević, B., & Modic, D. (2011). Regional systems of innovations as social fields. Sociologija i Prostor, 191(3), 313–333.
  • Rončević, B., & Modic, D. (2012). Social fields of technological innovations. In N. Genov (Ed.), Global trends and regional development (pp. 226–247). Routledge.
  • Rončević, B., Modic, D., & Golob, T. (2022). Social-fields-approach (SOFIA) to research on social change: Innovations as social fields. In B. Rončević, & V. Cepoi (Eds.), Technologies and innovations in regional development: The European Union and its strategies. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17733
  • Rončević, B., Tomšič, M., & Besednjak Valič, T., (2023). How media pluralism navigates ideological orientations: The case of Slovenia. Frontiers in Communication, 8, Article 1143786. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1143786
  • Sánchez, H., Aguilar, J., Terán, O., & de Mesa, J. G. (2019). Modeling the process of shaping the public opinion through multilevel fuzzy cognitive maps. Applied Soft Computing, 85, Article 105756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105756
  • Schuller, B., Mousa, A. E. D., & Vryniotis, V. (2015). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining: On optimal parameters and performances. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5(5), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1159
  • Stangor, C., & Walinga, J. (2014). Communicating with others: The development and use of language. BC Open Textbooks. https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/chapter/9-3-communicating-with-others-the-development-and-use-of-language/
  • Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056916
  • Stojcevski, T., & Valic, T. B. (2022). Shaping the public in Southeast Europe: Social fields analysis. Balkan Social Science Review, 19, 263–281. https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR2219263s
  • Stuart, K. D., & Majewski, M. (2015). Intelligent opinion mining and sentiment analysis using artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing (pp. 103–110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26561-2_13
  • Thomas, F. N., & Turner, M. (2017). Clear and simple as the truth: Writing classic prose. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400887354
  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
  • Uzzi, B. (2018). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. In M. Granovetter, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (213–241). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338-13
  • Weber, M. (1946). Essays in sociology; translated, edited, and with an introduction by H. H. Gerth, & C. Wright Mills. Oxford University Press.