Understanding the Prevalence and Forms of Cyber Bullying at Univen: A Pilot Study

Memory Mabika 1 *, Bevelyn Dube 1
More Detail
1 University of Venda, South Africa
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp. 174-190. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2586
OPEN ACCESS   2022 Views   1921 Downloads   Published online: 26 Jan 2017
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Bullying is a phenomenon which is as old as the human race. However, with the advent of new Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) new forms of bullying, commonly known as cyber bullying, have developed in society. The phenomenon is perceived by many to be a deviant practice among adolescents and teenagers in environments such as schools and colleges. Much academic work on cyber bullying has focused on school children, yet in institutions of higher learning such as universities show that cyber bullying has also become a noticeable problem, worthy of study. Using the Routine Activity Theory (RAT), this article explores the prevalence and forms of cyber bullying at the University of Venda (UNIVEN), a historically disadvantaged, rural-based institution of higher learning, which is still facing various capacity and infrastructural challenges. Key data that form the basis of this article were collected through a structured questionnaire from a sample of 2014 first year students at UNIVEN. The findings revealed high levels of cyber bullying among UNIVEN first year students. The study findings also revealed a need for more research on the phenomenon in order to establish the causes, effects and possible solutions to this growing scourge at UNIVEN.
Keywords: Cyber bullying, ICTs, prevalence, Routine Activity Theory, students, University of Venda

CITATION

Mabika, M., & Dube, B. (2017). Understanding the Prevalence and Forms of Cyber Bullying at Univen: A Pilot Study. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(1), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2586

REFERENCES

  • Alfreds, D. (2013, August 12). Cyber bullying growing in SA. Retrieved May 24, 2015, from News24: http://m.news24.com/news24/Technology/News/Cyber-bullying-growingin-SA-20130812
  • Babbie, L. (2005). The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Van Schaik Booksellers.
  • Badenhorst, C. (2011, August). Legal Responses to Cyber Bullying and Sexting in South Africa. Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention(CJCP Issue Paper No.10). Claremont, Gauteng, South Africa: Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention.
  • Bailey, C. (2012, February 10). Bullting on the Increase. Retrieved 04 17, 2014, from IOL: http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/gauteng/bullying-on-the-increase-1.1231474?
  • Beran, T. N., Ridaldi, C., Bickham, D. S., & Rich, M. (2012). Evidence for the Need to Support Adolescents Dealing with Harassment and Vyber-Harassment: Prevalence, Progression, and Impact. School Psychology International, 33(5), 562-576.
  • Burton, P., & Mutongwizo, T. (2009, December). Inescapable Violence: Cyber Bullying and Electronic Violence Against Young People in South Africa. Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention. Claremont, Gauteng, South Africa: Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention.
  • Carter, M. A. (2013). Protecting Oneself from Cyber Bullying on Social Media Sites - A Study of Undergraduate Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1229-1235.
  • Cesaroni, C., Downing, S., & Alvi, S. (2012). Bullying Enters the 21st Century? Turning a Critical Eye ot Cyber-bullying Research. Youth Justice, 12(3), 119-211.
  • Delice , M. (2011). How the Routine Activity Theory can Help. Turkish Journal of Police Studies, 13(1), 137-154.
  • Dolu, Osman, (2009), In Delice, M, (2011), How the Routine Activity Theory can Help. Turkish Journal of Police Studies, 13(1), 137-154.
  • Finkelhor, D., & Asdigian, N. L. (1996). Factors for Youth Victimization: Beyond a Lifestyles/Routine Activities Theory Approach. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 3-19.
  • Icellioglu, S., & Ozden, M. S. (2014). Cyberbullying: A New Kind of Peer Bullying Through Online Technology and its Relationship with Aggression and Social Anxiety. Procedia - Social Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4241-4245.
  • Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, Physical, and Academic Correlates of Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, S13-S20.
  • Langos, C. (2012). Cyberbullying: The Challenge to Define. Cybepyschology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 15(6), 285-289.
  • Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2012). Estonian Students' Perception and Definition of Vyberbullying. Trames, 16(4), 323-343.
  • Ncontsa , V. N., & Shumba, A. (2013). The Nature, Causes and Effects of School Violence in South African High Schools. Journal of Education, 33(3), 1-15.
  • Obijiofor, L. M., Inayatullah, S., & Stevenson, T. (2000). Impact of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) on socio-economic and educational development of Africa and the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Futures Studies, 4(2), 21-66.
  • Ozden, M. S., & Icellioglu, S. (2014). The Perceptions of Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization by university students Students in Terms of their Personality Factors. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences - WCES 2013 (pp. 4379- 4383). Prodcedia - Social Behavioral Sciences.
  • Popocic-Citic, B., Djuric, S., & Cvetkovic, V. (2011). The Prevalence of Cyberbullying among Adolecents: A Case of Middle Schools in Serbia. School Psychology International, 32(4), 412-424.
  • Popovac, M., & Leoschut, L. (2012, June). Cyber bullying in South Africa: Impact and Responses. Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention. Claremont, Gauteng, South Africa: Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention.
  • Bernal, C., & Angulo, F. (2013). Interactions of Young Andalusian People. Revista Científica de Educomunicación, 25-30.
  • Beran, T. N., Ridaldi, C., Bickham, D. S., & Rich, M. (2012). Evidence for the Need to Support Adolescents Dealing with Harassment and Vyber-Harassment: Prevalence, Progression, and Impact. School Psychology International, 33(5), 562-576.
  • Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old Behaviour. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277.
  • Cowie, H. A. (2011). Coping with the emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying: How researchcan inform practice. International Journal of Emotional Education,3(2), 50- 56.
  • Delice , M. (2011). How the Routine Activity Theory can Help. Turkish Journal of Police Studies, 13(1), 137-154.
  • Dolu, Osman, (2009), In Delice, M, (2011), How the Routine Activity Theory can Help. Turkish Journal of Police Studies, 13(1), 137-154.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dueck, S. (n.d.). Cyberbullying: A new place for an old practice.
  • Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social research update, 19(8), 1-8.
  • Gillespie, A. A. (2006, June). Cyber-bullying and Harassment of Teenagers: The Legal Response. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 28(2), 123–136.
  • Hanewald, R. (2008). Confronting the pedagogical challenge of cyber safety. Australian Journal for Teacher Education, 33(3), 1-16.
  • Jaishankar, K., & Uma Sankary, V. (2005). Cyber stalking: A global menace in the information super highway. ERCES Online Quarterly Review, 2(3).
  • Jordan, J., Lynch, U., Moutray, M., O’Hagan, M. T., Orr, J., Peake, S., & Power, J. (2007). Using focus groups to research sensitive issues: Insights from group interviews on nursing in the Northern Ireland “Troubles”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(4), 1-19
  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace Journal of School health. Journal of School health, 78(9), 496-505.
  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Social Analysis, Selected Tools and Techniques”, Krueger, RA, MA Casey, J. Donner, S. Kirsch and JN Maack, 4-23.
  • Langos, C. (2012). Cyberbullying: The Challenge to Define. Cybepyschology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 15(6), 285-289.
  • Mabika, M. (2015). Understanding Cyber bullying at UNIVEN: A pilot study. Unpublished conference paper.
  • Miller, C. (2007, January 05). Zimbabwean Broadcasting: From Colin Miller: Zimbabwe. Retrieved January 23, 2013, from Zimbaber Broadcast History: http://www.oldradio.com/archives/international/zimb.htm
  • Notar, C. E., Padgett, S., & Roden, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 1-9.
  • O'Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics , 127(4), 800-804.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254.
  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 4(2), 148-169.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behaviour research methods, instruments, & computers, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Piotrowski, C. (2012). From Workplace Bullying to Cyberbullying: The Enigma of EHarassment in Modern Organizations. Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 44- 53.
  • Poland, S. (2010). Cyberbullying continues to challenge educators. In Notar, C. E., Padgett, S., & Roden, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 1-9.
  • Popovac, M., & Leoschut, L. (2012, June). Cyber bullying in South Africa: Impact and Responses. Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention. Claremont, Gauteng, South Africa: Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention.
  • Šléglová, V., & Černá, A. (2011). Cyberbullying in Adolescent Victims: Perception and Coping. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 5(2), 1-15.
  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
  • Univen Visits University of Fort Hare. (2014, April). Nendila: Newsletter of the University of Venda, p. 1.
  • Van den Berg, P. E., Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. P. (2012). New ICTs and Social Interaction: Modelling Communication Frequency and Communication Mode Choice. New Media Society, 14(6), 987-1003.
  • Veenstra, S. (2009). Cyberbullying:An Explanatory Analysis. University of Leicester, MSc Community Safety, Department of Criminology .
  • Wilcox, P. (2010). Victimization, Theories of. In B. Fisher, & S. Lab (Eds.), Enclopedia of Victimology and Crime Prevention (pp. 978-986). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Wong, D. W., Chan, H. O., & Cheng, C. K. (2013). Cyberbullying Perpertration and Victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 133-140.
  • Zacchilli, T. L., & Valerio, C. Y. (2011). The Knowledge and Prevalence of Cyberullying in a College Sample. Journal od Scientific Psychology, 11-23.