Young People’s Engagement of Social Media for Social Transformation: Study of Nigerian University Students

Chikezie Emmanuel Uzuegbunam 1 *
More Detail
1 Nnamdi Azikiwe University, NIGERIA
* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Volume 5, Issue September 2015 - Special Issue, pp. 171-194. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5699
OPEN ACCESS   2176 Views   1311 Downloads   Published online: 01 Sep 2015
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study using a sample size of 400 for survey and 12 focus group participants drawn from the population of a federal University in Nigeria, investigates the practicality of thinking about social media as online public sphere that offers Nigerian youth opportunity for such meaningful civic engagement and agenda setting. It investigates the level of access and social media literacy inherent in these youth, the uses they make of it, the extent of exposure and use and whether these translate into a culture of social transformation among these youth. Using the Uses-and-gratifications and public sphere theories, the study combined the use of survey and focus group discussions. The study finds that the level of awareness, exposure and use of Facebook among these youth is quite high. It is however found that the youth tend to make more personal, trivial and entertaining use of Facebook. The youth’s social media usage thus disengages rather than makes for active engagement with their expected role in social transformation and development. The youth, with reasons, have never used Facebook or indeed any other social media to advocate or win support for a cause geared towards social change or social development of the society. It is concluded that Nigerian youth should be challenged to embrace serious online activism through the positive, prudent, informed, literate, and better appropriated use of the social media as both a socialisation and an empowering tool.

CITATION

Uzuegbunam, C. E. (2015). Young People’s Engagement of Social Media for Social Transformation: Study of Nigerian University Students. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(September 2015 - Special Issue), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5699

REFERENCES

  • Abubakar, A.A (2011) Political participation and discourse in social media during the 2011 Presidential Electioneering. Paper presented at the ACCE conference, Covenant University, Ota, September 2011.
  • Adaja, T.A. & Ayodele, F.A. (2013). Nigerian youths and social media: Harnessing the potentials for academic excellence. Kuwait Chapter of Journal of Business & Management Review 2(5), 65 – 75.
  • Ahn, J. (2011). The effects of Social networking sites on adolescents’ social and academic development: Current theories and controversies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(8), 1435 – 1445.
  • Allan, S. (2010). Issues in cultural and media studies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Al-Jenaibi, B.N.A. (2011). Use of social media in the United Arab Emirates: An initial study. Global Media Journal, Arabian Edition, 1(2), 3 – 27.
  • Amadi, S. (2012). Nigerian youth, Nigerian failure, Nigerian hope. Text of lecture delivered at the 2012 International Youth Day Lecture organised by the African Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL) to mark the 2012 International Youth Day, Abuja, Wednesday, August 8, 2012.
  • Amaza, M. (2012). Are we done occupying Nigeria? Nigeria Dialogue online. Accessed 23 June 2013.
  • Asuni, J.B. & Farris, J. (2011). Tracking social media: the social media tracking center and the 2011 Nigerian elections. Official document published by Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Foundation.
  • Boyd, d. (2010). Owning a digital identity. In C. Hannon & C. Tims (Eds.), The anatomy of youth (pp. 94 – 99). United Kingdom: Magdalen House.
  • boyd, d. m. & Ellison, N. B. (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210 – 230.
  • British Council Nigeria (2012). Gender in Nigeria report 2012 (2nd Edition). Published by the Department for International Development [UKaid].
  • Bruns, A. (2009, September). From prosumer to produser: Understanding user-led content creation. Paper presented at the Transforming Audiences Conference, London, UK. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27370.
  • Chan-Meetoo, C. & Rathacharen, D. (2010). Young adults and social networking sites in Mauritius. Published by the Faculty of Social Studies & Humanities, University of Mauritius.
  • Chen, P.J. & Vromen, A. (2012). Social media, youth participation and Australian elections. Document prepared by Australian Electoral Commission for the AEC Electoral Research Forum.
  • Constanza-Chock, S. (2012). Youth and social movements: Key lessons for allies. Published by Born This Way Foundation & The Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2011). Reconstructing digital democracy: an outline of four positions. New Media and Society, 13(6), 855-872.
  • Dhaha, I.S.Y. & Igale, A.B. (2013). Facebook usage among Somali youth: A test of uses-and-gratifications approach. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(3), 299 – 313.
  • Dunu, I.V. & Uzochukwu, C.E. (2011). Social media: an effective tool for social mobilisation in Nigeria. Being a paper presented at the Nwuneli International Conference on Communication, held 3 – 5 July 2011, BarnHill Hotel and Resort, Awka.
  • Ebersole, S. (2000). Uses and gratifications of the web among students. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1).
  • Ellison N., Steinfield C., Lampe C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(3), 1143–1168.
  • Evers, C. W., Albury, K., Byron, P. & Crawford, K. (2013). Young people, social media, social network sites and sexual health communication in Australia: “This is Funny, You Should Watch It”. International Journal of Communication 7, 263–280.
  • Facebook (2012b). Statistics. Available at: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics Accessed 6 April 2013.
  • Fletcher, D. (2010, May, 31). Friends without borders. Time, 22 – 28.
  • Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media – A critical introduction. London, California, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Harlow, S. (2011). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225–243. DOI: 10.1177/1461444811410408.
  • Hauben, M. & Hauben, R. (1997). Netizens: On the history and impact of usenet and the Internet. Los Alamitos, Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
  • Heaven, C. & Tubridy, M. (2007). Global youth culture and youth identity. Available at http://www.verina.vesel.info/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/youth_culture1.pdf.
  • Johnson, M. (2011). Tweets from Birmingham jail. Media Development, LVIII (1), 17 – 18.
  • Kaplan, M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53 (1), 59 – 68.
  • Large, A. (2005). Children, teenagers, and the web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 347–392.
  • Liamputtong, P. (2010). Focus group methodology: Introduction and history. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How non-profit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 337-353. DOI:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
  • Marichal, J. (2012). Facebook Democracy: The architecture of disclosure and the threat to public life, Surrey, UK, Ashgate.
  • Mayfield, T. (2008). What is social media? An e-book published by iCrossing, 4.
  • McDonnel, J. (2011). Only connect: Social relations in an online world. Media Development, LVIII (1), 3 – 6.
  • Meerman Scott, D. (2010). The new rules of marketing and PR: How to use social media, blogs, news releases, online video, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Morozov, E. (2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://neteffect.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/05/19/the_brave_new_world_of_slackti vim
  • Morozov, E. (2010). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. London: Allen Lane. Chapter 7: Why Kierkegard hates slacktivism.
  • My Media Generation (2005). Truly, madly, deeply engaged: Global youth, media and technology. Published by Yahoo! Summit Series. Available online.
  • Nwonwu, F.C. (2 December, 2011). New media: Bridging the gap between government and the governed in Nigeria. Nigerian Village Square Online. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
  • Obijiofor, L. (2009). Perceptions and use of Internet and email technologies by Nigerian university undergraduate students. Paper presented at the African Council for Communication Education, ACCE conference, University of Ghana, Accra, 11 – 13 August 2009.
  • Omenugha, K.A, Ndolo, I.S. & Uzuegbunam, C.E. (2012). Celebrity culture, media and the Nigerian youth: negotiating cultural identity in a globalised world. Paper presented at the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) conference, Durban, South Africa, 15 – 19 July 2012.
  • Paxson, P. (2010) Mass communications and media studies: An introduction. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
  • Policy Forum (2012). Engaging youth in planning education for social transformation. Provisional agenda from conference held 16 – 18 October 2012, IIEP, Paris, France.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Safranek, R. (2012). The emerging role of social media in political and regime change. ProQuest. Available at http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides-main. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 434–445.
  • Trusov, M, Bucklin, R. E, & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing 73, 90–102.
  • Ubayasiri, K. (2007). Internet and the public sphere: A glimpse of YouTube. Central Queensland University. Retrieved on June 30, 2013 from www.ejournalist.com.au/v6n2/ubayasiri622.pdf.
  • Ufuophu-biri, E. (2013). Perception and usage pattern of social media by students of higher institutions of learning in Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Communication & Media Research, 5(1), 15 – 26.
  • United Nations (2011). Youth participation in development. Summary guidelines for development partners. Available at www.ygproject.org. Accessed 26 February 2013.
  • Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist 57(7), 920–942. DOI: 10.1177/0002764213479375.
  • Vallor, S. (2007). The present and future of social networking. Panel discussion at Santa Clara University.http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/technology/social- networking.html
  • Weinberg, T. (2009). The new community rules: Marketing on the social web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
  • Wellman, B. & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.) (2002). The Internet in everyday life. London: Blackwell.
  • Wu, J. (2009). An exploratory study of American youth’s political engagement during the 2008 presidential election. Unpublished PhD thesis of the University of New York.